All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, devel@openvz.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:57:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120516135755.cdcdf9ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB35153.3080309@parallels.com>

On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:03:47 +0400
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:

> On 05/14/2012 05:38 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> +static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > 
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> >> +	if (memcg->tcp_mem.cg_proto.activated)
> >> +		static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);
> >> +#endif
> >> +}
> > 
> > 
> > Move this inside the ifdef/endif below ?
> > 
> > Otherwise I think you'll get compile error if !CONFIG_INET...
> 
> I don't fully get it.
> 
> We are supposed to provide a version of it for
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM and an empty version for
> !CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> 
> Inside the first, we take an action for CONFIG_INET, and no action for
> !CONFIG_INET.
> 
> Bear in mind that the slab patches will add another test to that place,
> and that's why I am doing it this way from the beginning.
> 
> Well, that said, I not only can be wrong, I very frequently am.
> 
> But I just compiled this one with and without CONFIG_INET, and it seems
> to be going alright.
> 

Yes, the ifdeffings in that area are rather nasty.

I wonder if it would be simpler to do away with the ifdef nesting. 
At the top-level, just do

#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
	if (memcg->tcp_mem.cg_proto.activated)
		static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);
}
#else
static inline void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
}
#endif


The tcp_proto_cgroup() definition could go inside that ifdef as well.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <devel@openvz.org>,
	<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:57:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120516135755.cdcdf9ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB35153.3080309@parallels.com>

On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:03:47 +0400
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:

> On 05/14/2012 05:38 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> +static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > 
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> >> +	if (memcg->tcp_mem.cg_proto.activated)
> >> +		static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);
> >> +#endif
> >> +}
> > 
> > 
> > Move this inside the ifdef/endif below ?
> > 
> > Otherwise I think you'll get compile error if !CONFIG_INET...
> 
> I don't fully get it.
> 
> We are supposed to provide a version of it for
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM and an empty version for
> !CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> 
> Inside the first, we take an action for CONFIG_INET, and no action for
> !CONFIG_INET.
> 
> Bear in mind that the slab patches will add another test to that place,
> and that's why I am doing it this way from the beginning.
> 
> Well, that said, I not only can be wrong, I very frequently am.
> 
> But I just compiled this one with and without CONFIG_INET, and it seems
> to be going alright.
> 

Yes, the ifdeffings in that area are rather nasty.

I wonder if it would be simpler to do away with the ifdef nesting. 
At the top-level, just do

#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
	if (memcg->tcp_mem.cg_proto.activated)
		static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);
}
#else
static inline void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
}
#endif


The tcp_proto_cgroup() definition could go inside that ifdef as well.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-16 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-11 20:11 [PATCH v5 0/2] fix static_key disabling problem in memcg Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] Always free struct memcg through schedule_work() Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11   ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1336767077-25351-2-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14  0:56     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14  0:56       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11   ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1336767077-25351-3-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14  0:59     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14  0:59       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
     [not found]       ` <4FB058D8.6060707-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16  6:03         ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  6:03           ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  6:03           ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]           ` <4FB3431C.3050402-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16  7:04             ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  7:04               ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  7:04               ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]               ` <4FB3518B.3090205-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16  8:28                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-16  8:28                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
     [not found]                   ` <4FB3652D.2040909-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16  8:30                     ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  8:30                       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  8:30                       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  8:37                     ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  8:37                       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  8:37                       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-14  1:38     ` Li Zefan
2012-05-14  1:38       ` Li Zefan
     [not found]       ` <4FB0621C.3010604-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16  7:03         ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  7:03           ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16  7:03           ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 20:57           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-05-16 20:57             ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-14 18:12     ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-14 18:12       ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-16 21:06     ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:06       ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:06       ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17  3:06       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17  3:06         ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17  3:06         ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]         ` <4FB46B4C.3000307-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17  5:37           ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17  5:37             ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17  5:37             ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]             ` <20120516223715.5d1b4385.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17  9:52               ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17  9:52                 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17  9:52                 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 10:18                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
     [not found]                   ` <4FB4D061.10406-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17 10:22                     ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 10:22                       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 10:22                       ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]                       ` <4FB4D14D.4020303-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17 10:27                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17 10:27                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17 15:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-17 17:02                 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17 17:02                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:13   ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:13     ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]     ` <20120516141342.911931e7.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17  0:07       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17  0:07         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17  3:09       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17  3:09         ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17  3:09         ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120516135755.cdcdf9ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.