From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:03:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB35153.3080309@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB0621C.3010604-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 05/14/2012 05:38 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> +static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> + if (memcg->tcp_mem.cg_proto.activated)
>> + static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>
>
> Move this inside the ifdef/endif below ?
>
> Otherwise I think you'll get compile error if !CONFIG_INET...
I don't fully get it.
We are supposed to provide a version of it for
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM and an empty version for
!CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
Inside the first, we take an action for CONFIG_INET, and no action for
!CONFIG_INET.
Bear in mind that the slab patches will add another test to that place,
and that's why I am doing it this way from the beginning.
Well, that said, I not only can be wrong, I very frequently am.
But I just compiled this one with and without CONFIG_INET, and it seems
to be going alright.
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> struct cg_proto *tcp_proto_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> {
>> @@ -452,6 +462,11 @@ struct cg_proto *tcp_proto_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_proto_cgroup);
>> #endif /* CONFIG_INET */
>> +#else
>> +static inline void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, devel@openvz.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:03:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB35153.3080309@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB0621C.3010604@huawei.com>
On 05/14/2012 05:38 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> +static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> + if (memcg->tcp_mem.cg_proto.activated)
>> + static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>
>
> Move this inside the ifdef/endif below ?
>
> Otherwise I think you'll get compile error if !CONFIG_INET...
I don't fully get it.
We are supposed to provide a version of it for
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM and an empty version for
!CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
Inside the first, we take an action for CONFIG_INET, and no action for
!CONFIG_INET.
Bear in mind that the slab patches will add another test to that place,
and that's why I am doing it this way from the beginning.
Well, that said, I not only can be wrong, I very frequently am.
But I just compiled this one with and without CONFIG_INET, and it seems
to be going alright.
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> struct cg_proto *tcp_proto_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> {
>> @@ -452,6 +462,11 @@ struct cg_proto *tcp_proto_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_proto_cgroup);
>> #endif /* CONFIG_INET */
>> +#else
>> +static inline void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
<devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:03:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB35153.3080309@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB0621C.3010604-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 05/14/2012 05:38 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> +static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> + if (memcg->tcp_mem.cg_proto.activated)
>> + static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>
>
> Move this inside the ifdef/endif below ?
>
> Otherwise I think you'll get compile error if !CONFIG_INET...
I don't fully get it.
We are supposed to provide a version of it for
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM and an empty version for
!CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
Inside the first, we take an action for CONFIG_INET, and no action for
!CONFIG_INET.
Bear in mind that the slab patches will add another test to that place,
and that's why I am doing it this way from the beginning.
Well, that said, I not only can be wrong, I very frequently am.
But I just compiled this one with and without CONFIG_INET, and it seems
to be going alright.
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> struct cg_proto *tcp_proto_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> {
>> @@ -452,6 +462,11 @@ struct cg_proto *tcp_proto_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_proto_cgroup);
>> #endif /* CONFIG_INET */
>> +#else
>> +static inline void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-11 20:11 [PATCH v5 0/2] fix static_key disabling problem in memcg Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] Always free struct memcg through schedule_work() Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1336767077-25351-2-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-11 20:11 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1336767077-25351-3-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 0:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 0:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4FB058D8.6060707-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16 6:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 6:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 6:03 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4FB3431C.3050402-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16 7:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 7:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 7:04 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4FB3518B.3090205-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16 8:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-16 8:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4FB3652D.2040909-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16 8:30 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 8:30 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 8:30 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 8:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 8:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 8:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-14 1:38 ` Li Zefan
2012-05-14 1:38 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <4FB0621C.3010604-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-16 7:03 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-05-16 7:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 7:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-16 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-14 18:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-14 18:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-16 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17 3:06 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 3:06 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 3:06 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4FB46B4C.3000307-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17 5:37 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17 5:37 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17 5:37 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20120516223715.5d1b4385.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17 9:52 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 9:52 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 9:52 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 10:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4FB4D061.10406-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17 10:22 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 10:22 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 10:22 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4FB4D14D.4020303-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17 10:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17 10:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-17 17:02 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17 17:02 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-16 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20120516141342.911931e7.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-17 0:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17 0:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-17 3:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 3:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-17 3:09 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB35153.3080309@parallels.com \
--to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.