From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings.
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:35:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615183518.514853E0ACE@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339572841-26175-2-git-send-email-lethal@linux-sh.org>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:34:01 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> This implements a sledgehammer approach for batched domain unmapping
> regardless of domain type. In the linear revmap case it's fairly easy to
> track state and iterate over the IRQs disposing of them one at a time,
> but it's not always so straightforward in the radix tree case.
>
> A new irq_domain_dispose_mappings() is added to ensure all of the
> mappings are appropriately discarded, and is to be used prior to domain
> removal. Gang lookups are batched, presently 16 at a time, for no reason
> other than it seemed like a good number at the time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 58defd5..6f27c55 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static inline int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int i
> extern unsigned int irq_create_mapping(struct irq_domain *host,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
> extern void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq);
> +extern void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain);
> extern unsigned int irq_find_mapping(struct irq_domain *host,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
> extern unsigned int irq_create_direct_mapping(struct irq_domain *host);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 8591cb6..40c9ba1 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,49 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_dispose_mapping);
>
> +#define IRQ_DOMAIN_BATCH_IRQS 16
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_domain_dispose_mappings() - Dispose of all mappings in a domain
> + * @domain: domain to tear down
> + */
> +void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain)
> +{
> + if (domain->revmap_type = IRQ_DOMAIN_MAP_NOMAP)
> + return;
> +
> + if (domain->linear_size) {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < domain->linear_size; i++)
> + irq_dispose_mapping(domain->linear_revmap[i]);
> + } else {
The 'else' should be dropped I think. With the merge of linear and
tree mappings into the same domain type, it is possible for a domain
to have both linear and tree mappings in the same instance. So tree
needs to be cleared even if linear_size is non-zero.
> + struct irq_data *irq_data_batch[IRQ_DOMAIN_BATCH_IRQS];
> + unsigned int nr_found;
> + unsigned long index = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + for (;;) {
Nit; while not 'while(1)'?
> + int i;
Nit; move 'i' up with nr_found above.
> +
> + nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&domain->radix_tree,
> + (void **)irq_data_batch, index,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(irq_data_batch));
> + if (!nr_found)
> + break;
Or better:
while (nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&domain->radix_tree,
(void **)irq_data_batch, index,
ARRAY_SIZE(irq_data_batch))) {
Otherwise seems okay... though the gang lookup feels more complex than
it needs to be.
g.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++)
> + irq_dispose_mapping(irq_data_batch[i]->irq);
> +
> + index += nr_found;
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_dispose_mappings);
> +
> /**
> * irq_find_mapping() - Find a linux irq from an hw irq number.
> * @domain: domain owning this hardware interrupt
> --
> 1.7.9.rc0.28.g0e1cf
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings.
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:35:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615183518.514853E0ACE@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339572841-26175-2-git-send-email-lethal@linux-sh.org>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:34:01 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> This implements a sledgehammer approach for batched domain unmapping
> regardless of domain type. In the linear revmap case it's fairly easy to
> track state and iterate over the IRQs disposing of them one at a time,
> but it's not always so straightforward in the radix tree case.
>
> A new irq_domain_dispose_mappings() is added to ensure all of the
> mappings are appropriately discarded, and is to be used prior to domain
> removal. Gang lookups are batched, presently 16 at a time, for no reason
> other than it seemed like a good number at the time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 58defd5..6f27c55 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static inline int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int i
> extern unsigned int irq_create_mapping(struct irq_domain *host,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
> extern void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq);
> +extern void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain);
> extern unsigned int irq_find_mapping(struct irq_domain *host,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
> extern unsigned int irq_create_direct_mapping(struct irq_domain *host);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 8591cb6..40c9ba1 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,49 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_dispose_mapping);
>
> +#define IRQ_DOMAIN_BATCH_IRQS 16
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_domain_dispose_mappings() - Dispose of all mappings in a domain
> + * @domain: domain to tear down
> + */
> +void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain)
> +{
> + if (domain->revmap_type == IRQ_DOMAIN_MAP_NOMAP)
> + return;
> +
> + if (domain->linear_size) {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < domain->linear_size; i++)
> + irq_dispose_mapping(domain->linear_revmap[i]);
> + } else {
The 'else' should be dropped I think. With the merge of linear and
tree mappings into the same domain type, it is possible for a domain
to have both linear and tree mappings in the same instance. So tree
needs to be cleared even if linear_size is non-zero.
> + struct irq_data *irq_data_batch[IRQ_DOMAIN_BATCH_IRQS];
> + unsigned int nr_found;
> + unsigned long index = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + for (;;) {
Nit; while not 'while(1)'?
> + int i;
Nit; move 'i' up with nr_found above.
> +
> + nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&domain->radix_tree,
> + (void **)irq_data_batch, index,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(irq_data_batch));
> + if (!nr_found)
> + break;
Or better:
while (nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&domain->radix_tree,
(void **)irq_data_batch, index,
ARRAY_SIZE(irq_data_batch))) {
Otherwise seems okay... though the gang lookup feels more complex than
it needs to be.
g.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++)
> + irq_dispose_mapping(irq_data_batch[i]->irq);
> +
> + index += nr_found;
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_dispose_mappings);
> +
> /**
> * irq_find_mapping() - Find a linux irq from an hw irq number.
> * @domain: domain owning this hardware interrupt
> --
> 1.7.9.rc0.28.g0e1cf
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 7:34 [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: Fix up linear revmap for non-zero hwirq displacement Paul Mundt
2012-06-13 7:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings Paul Mundt
2012-06-13 7:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 18:35 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-06-15 18:35 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 22:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 22:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-17 23:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-17 23:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: Fix up linear revmap for non-zero hwirq displacement Grant Likely
2012-06-15 18:25 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 23:14 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 23:14 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-21 1:19 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-21 1:19 ` Paul Mundt
2012-07-11 15:22 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-11 15:22 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120615183518.514853E0ACE@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.