From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings.
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:48:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120617234833.32D303E086D@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120615223403.GB7357@linux-sh.org>
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:34:03 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:35:18PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:34:01 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * irq_domain_dispose_mappings() - Dispose of all mappings in a domain
> > > + * @domain: domain to tear down
> > > + */
> > > +void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > > +{
> > > + if (domain->revmap_type = IRQ_DOMAIN_MAP_NOMAP)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (domain->linear_size) {
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < domain->linear_size; i++)
> > > + irq_dispose_mapping(domain->linear_revmap[i]);
> > > + } else {
> >
> > The 'else' should be dropped I think. With the merge of linear and
> > tree mappings into the same domain type, it is possible for a domain
> > to have both linear and tree mappings in the same instance. So tree
> > needs to be cleared even if linear_size is non-zero.
> >
> Ok, that's fine. Though by that same logic wouldn't it also be possible
> for a domain to have multiple linear ranges?
except that there is only one linear map. It would be possible to
have multiple maps, but I'm going to resist adding a whole lot of
options for reverse mapping to keep the lookup overhead low. A
sufficiently large linear map would also handle multiple linear maps.
g.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings.
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:48:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120617234833.32D303E086D@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120615223403.GB7357@linux-sh.org>
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:34:03 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:35:18PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:34:01 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * irq_domain_dispose_mappings() - Dispose of all mappings in a domain
> > > + * @domain: domain to tear down
> > > + */
> > > +void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > > +{
> > > + if (domain->revmap_type == IRQ_DOMAIN_MAP_NOMAP)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (domain->linear_size) {
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < domain->linear_size; i++)
> > > + irq_dispose_mapping(domain->linear_revmap[i]);
> > > + } else {
> >
> > The 'else' should be dropped I think. With the merge of linear and
> > tree mappings into the same domain type, it is possible for a domain
> > to have both linear and tree mappings in the same instance. So tree
> > needs to be cleared even if linear_size is non-zero.
> >
> Ok, that's fine. Though by that same logic wouldn't it also be possible
> for a domain to have multiple linear ranges?
except that there is only one linear map. It would be possible to
have multiple maps, but I'm going to resist adding a whole lot of
options for reverse mapping to keep the lookup overhead low. A
sufficiently large linear map would also handle multiple linear maps.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-17 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 7:34 [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: Fix up linear revmap for non-zero hwirq displacement Paul Mundt
2012-06-13 7:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings Paul Mundt
2012-06-13 7:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 18:35 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 18:35 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 22:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 22:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-17 23:48 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-06-17 23:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: Fix up linear revmap for non-zero hwirq displacement Grant Likely
2012-06-15 18:25 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 23:14 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 23:14 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-21 1:19 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-21 1:19 ` Paul Mundt
2012-07-11 15:22 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-11 15:22 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120617234833.32D303E086D@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.