From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201206172040.44376.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDE1C28.8030605@denx.de>
Dear Stefano Babic,
> On 17/06/2012 19:50, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >>> But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because
> >>> Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches.
> >>
> >> And I like it more, it looks less like a typo.
> >
> > Sorry; I didn't get what you meant ... should it go or not?
>
> Hi Otavio,
>
> I make also my point clearer for Marek: my point is that the behavior
> for all i.MX must be consistent. If you change here, please change also
> for i.MX31 (that returns "unknown in print_cpuinfo) and for other SOCs
> that returns "unknown" in print_cpuinfo() - or let the code as now.
Ah, I thought it was about the revision. Ok, whatever way is fine by me.
> Best regards,
> Stefano
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-17 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-17 12:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] i.MX refactoring patchset Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 12:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:09 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:21 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 15:43 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 15:48 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 16:03 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 17:50 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 18:04 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 18:40 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-06-17 18:04 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 12:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mxs: generalize code for print_cpuinfo() Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:10 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:25 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 14:14 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 14:35 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 15:10 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 15:17 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:28 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 15:49 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 16:02 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 17:56 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 18:03 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 18:41 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 18:04 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 17:49 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 12:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx28evk: extend default environment Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 21:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] i.MX refactoring patchset Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201206172040.44376.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.