From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mxs: generalize code for print_cpuinfo()
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:41:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201206172041.49705.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKq3maH84iC5p4z53wRjasquacV_936=voovsBvuo+z43w@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Otavio Salvador,
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
> >> Correct, but isn't the return value mangled somehow (like having major
> >> rev. << 16 and minor rev. << 0 )? Or that's only IMX?
> >
> > Checking in current implementations for get_cpu_rev() (i.MX / OMAP24 /
> > OMAP3 / AM33, and even board/apollon/sys_info.c: I do not know why the
> > cpu detection is inseide this file), none of them requires strictly 32
> > bit. However, we should be coherent in all code - for this reason I
> > dislike if one of the i.MX is implemented differently as for other SOCs.
>
> So, we change this one to follow the others or fix the others?
Fix the others ;-)
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-17 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-17 12:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] i.MX refactoring patchset Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 12:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:09 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:21 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 15:43 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 15:48 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 16:03 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 17:50 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 18:04 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 18:40 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 18:04 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 12:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mxs: generalize code for print_cpuinfo() Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:10 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:25 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 14:14 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-17 14:35 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 15:10 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 15:17 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 13:28 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 15:49 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 16:02 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 17:56 ` Stefano Babic
2012-06-17 18:03 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 18:41 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-06-17 18:04 ` Marek Vasut
2012-06-17 17:49 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 12:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx28evk: extend default environment Otavio Salvador
2012-06-17 21:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] i.MX refactoring patchset Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201206172041.49705.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.