From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Support for 'Coda' video codec IP.
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:31:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620133148.GP3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120620130941.GB2253@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:09:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The approach a lot of platforms have been taking is that it's OK to keep
> > on maintaining existing boards using board files (especially for trivial
> > things like adding new devices).
> I think that's the approach being taken during the transition to device
> tree. But it's definitely a desirable thing to remove those board
> files with device tree support at some point, because not having non-DT
> users will ease platform maintenance and new feature adoption a lot
> easier, for example linear irqdomain.
Moving to irqdomain without DT is really very easy, you just need to
select a legacy mapping if a base is provided and otherwise all the code
is identical - it just comes down to a field in platform data and an if
statement.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120620/e5fe107e/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
javier Martin <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com>,
fabio.estevam@freescale.com, dirk.behme@googlemail.com,
r.schwebel@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Support for 'Coda' video codec IP.
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:31:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620133148.GP3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120620130941.GB2253@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 866 bytes --]
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:09:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The approach a lot of platforms have been taking is that it's OK to keep
> > on maintaining existing boards using board files (especially for trivial
> > things like adding new devices).
> I think that's the approach being taken during the transition to device
> tree. But it's definitely a desirable thing to remove those board
> files with device tree support at some point, because not having non-DT
> users will ease platform maintenance and new feature adoption a lot
> easier, for example linear irqdomain.
Moving to irqdomain without DT is really very easy, you just need to
select a legacy mapping if a base is provided and otherwise all the code
is identical - it just comes down to a field in platform data and an if
statement.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 14:11 [RFC] Support for 'Coda' video codec IP Javier Martin
2012-06-19 14:11 ` Javier Martin
2012-06-19 18:17 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-19 18:17 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20 7:51 ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 7:51 ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 9:01 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20 9:01 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20 10:00 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 10:00 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 13:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 13:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 13:31 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-06-20 13:31 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 13:56 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 13:56 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 14:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 14:25 ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:25 ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:33 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:33 ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-02 10:36 ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 10:36 ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 10:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-07-02 10:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-07-02 11:13 ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 11:13 ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 13:48 ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 13:48 ` javier Martin
2012-07-03 19:42 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-07-03 19:42 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-20 14:03 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:03 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:10 ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:10 ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:25 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:25 ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:31 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20 14:31 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20 3:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-20 3:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-20 8:09 ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 8:09 ` javier Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120620133148.GP3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.