All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Support for 'Coda' video codec IP.
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:27:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620142733.GQ3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120620135633.GA2513@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:56:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:31:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Moving to irqdomain without DT is really very easy, you just need to
> > select a legacy mapping if a base is provided and otherwise all the code
> > is identical - it just comes down to a field in platform data and an if
> > statement.

> Yeah, but I guess what I'm saying is *linear* irqdomain.

Sure, but like I say the only code change required for keeping platform
data working is the three lines or so required to change to a legacy
mapping if you've got an irq_base.  All my development systems currently
use linear domains for several of the IRQ domains on a totally non-DT
system.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120620/8d4f57e9/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	javier Martin <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com>,
	fabio.estevam@freescale.com, dirk.behme@googlemail.com,
	r.schwebel@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Support for 'Coda' video codec IP.
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:27:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620142733.GQ3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120620135633.GA2513@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 716 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:56:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:31:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Moving to irqdomain without DT is really very easy, you just need to
> > select a legacy mapping if a base is provided and otherwise all the code
> > is identical - it just comes down to a field in platform data and an if
> > statement.

> Yeah, but I guess what I'm saying is *linear* irqdomain.

Sure, but like I say the only code change required for keeping platform
data working is the three lines or so required to change to a legacy
mapping if you've got an irq_base.  All my development systems currently
use linear domains for several of the IRQ domains on a totally non-DT
system.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19 14:11 [RFC] Support for 'Coda' video codec IP Javier Martin
2012-06-19 14:11 ` Javier Martin
2012-06-19 18:17 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-19 18:17   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20  7:51   ` javier Martin
2012-06-20  7:51     ` javier Martin
2012-06-20  9:01     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20  9:01       ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20 10:00       ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 10:00         ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 13:09         ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 13:09           ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 13:31           ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 13:31             ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 13:56             ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 13:56               ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:27               ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-06-20 14:27                 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 14:25           ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:25             ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:33             ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:33               ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-02 10:36               ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 10:36                 ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 10:54                 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-07-02 10:54                   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-07-02 11:13                   ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 11:13                     ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 13:48                     ` javier Martin
2012-07-02 13:48                       ` javier Martin
2012-07-03 19:42                       ` Fabio Estevam
2012-07-03 19:42                         ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-20 14:03         ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:03           ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:10           ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:10             ` javier Martin
2012-06-20 14:25             ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:25               ` Shawn Guo
2012-06-20 14:31               ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20 14:31                 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-20  3:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-20  3:26   ` Fabio Estevam
2012-06-20  8:09   ` javier Martin
2012-06-20  8:09     ` javier Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120620142733.GQ3978@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.