From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rcu: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#3, trinity-child19/5970
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:22:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120702142252.GA22868@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120702133334.GA2508@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:33:34AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:12:53PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 13:59 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > [ 37.048018] *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> OK, so it looks like the context-switch-time call into preemptible RCU
> needs to be outside of the runqueue-lock critical section. One way
> to do this is be reverting 616c310e (Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to
> switch_to() invocation). Sasha, could you please try this out?
Hmmmm... Here is a patch for this reversion on top of -rcu with
conflicts resolved.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revert "rcu: Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to switch_to() invocation"
This reverts commit 616c310e83b872024271c915c1b9ab505b9efad9.
(Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to switch_to() invocation).
Testing by Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> showed that this
can result in deadlock due to invoking the scheduler when one of
the runqueue locks is held. Because this commit was simply a
performance optimization, revert it.
Conflicts (resolved):
include/linux/rcutiny.h
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
index 88e466b..43b39d6 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
@@ -705,7 +705,6 @@ static void stack_proc(void *arg)
struct task_struct *from = current, *to = arg;
to->thread.saved_task = from;
- rcu_switch_from(from);
switch_to(from, to, from);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 2f5d89b..115ead2 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
/* Internal to kernel */
extern void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu);
extern void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu);
-extern void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void);
extern void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user);
struct notifier_block;
extern void rcu_idle_enter(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 854dc4c..4e56a9c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
+static inline void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
+{
+}
+
static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *delta_jiffies)
{
*delta_jiffies = ULONG_MAX;
@@ -95,6 +99,7 @@ static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *delta_jiffies)
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
+void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void);
int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(void);
static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *delta_jiffies)
@@ -108,6 +113,7 @@ static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *delta_jiffies)
static inline void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_preempt_note_context_switch();
}
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4059c0f..06a4c5f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1871,22 +1871,12 @@ static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_node_entry);
}
-static inline void rcu_switch_from(struct task_struct *prev)
-{
- if (prev->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 0)
- rcu_preempt_note_context_switch();
-}
-
#else
static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
{
}
-static inline void rcu_switch_from(struct task_struct *prev)
-{
-}
-
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index b9e6aaf..955f18c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
trace_rcu_utilization("Start context switch");
rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
+ rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(cpu);
trace_rcu_utilization("End context switch");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_note_context_switch);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 86a40b5..b9065dd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(char, rcu_cpu_has_work);
/* Forward declarations for rcutree_plugin.h */
static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
long rcu_batches_completed(void);
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu);
static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp,
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index dde457e..cf15a61 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
*
* Caller must disable preemption.
*/
-void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
(t->rcu_read_unlock_special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) == 0) {
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
- rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda);
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda, cpu);
rnp = rdp->mynode;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
* means that we continue to block the current grace period.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
- rcu_preempt_qs(smp_processor_id());
+ rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -902,6 +902,14 @@ void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_force_quiescent_state);
/*
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
+ * CPUs being in quiescent states.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
+{
+}
+
+/*
* Because preemptible RCU does not exist, there are never any preempted
* RCU readers.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d5594a4..eaead2d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2081,7 +2081,6 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
#endif
/* Here we just switch the register state and the stack. */
- rcu_switch_from(prev);
switch_to(prev, next, prev);
barrier();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-02 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-29 10:09 rcu: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#3, trinity-child19/5970 Sasha Levin
2012-06-29 17:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-29 21:40 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-29 22:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-29 22:40 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-29 23:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-02 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 11:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-02 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 13:12 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-02 13:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-02 14:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-07-02 14:36 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-02 14:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-04 14:54 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-04 19:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-30 11:36 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-30 13:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-30 13:28 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-30 13:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120702142252.GA22868@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.