All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rcu: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#3, trinity-child19/5970
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:07:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120704190731.GE2522@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341413691.18786.0.camel@lappy>

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 04:54:51PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 07:59 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 04:36:53PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > Looks like its running fine for a bit now (~10 min). I'll ping if
> > > anything changes, but on the other tests it has usually failed at this
> > > point.
> > If testing goes well (both yours and mine), I will be submitting this
> > as urgent, since it is a 3.5 regression.  If they don't take it, I will
> > queue it for 3.6.
> 
> 2 days later, and this didn't reproduce. I think we can say it's solved.

Very good, and thank you very much for all your testing efforts!

I have added a ten-microsecond delay to __rcu_read_unlock() under a
new CONFIG_RCU_PROVE_DELAY, and have added this to my testing regimen.
And I guess I have also added it in a probabilistic manner to the various
randconfig testing out there.  ;-)

Or will have when it hits mainline, probably 3.7.

							Thanx, Paul


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-04 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-29 10:09 rcu: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#3, trinity-child19/5970 Sasha Levin
2012-06-29 17:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-29 21:40   ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-29 22:27     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-29 22:40       ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-29 23:01         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-02 10:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 11:35       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-02 11:59         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 13:12           ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-02 13:33             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-02 14:22               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-02 14:36                 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-02 14:59                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-04 14:54                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-04 19:07                       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-06-30 11:36   ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-30 13:14     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-30 13:28       ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-30 13:58         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120704190731.GE2522@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.