All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	joshhunt00@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, rni@google.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, vwadekar@nvidia.com,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, swhiteho@redhat.com, bpm@sgi.com,
	elder@kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, marcel@holtmann.org,
	gustavo@padovan.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712214514.GD20167@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712170519.GA20167@google.com>

Hello, again.

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:05:19AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:06:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > [    0.207977] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/mm/kernel/workqueue.c:1217 worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b()
> > [    0.207977] Modules linked in:
> > [    0.207977] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6-08414-g9645fff #15
> > [    0.207977] Call Trace:
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087189>] ? worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff810559d9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xae/0xdb
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81055a2e>] warn_slowpath_null+0x28/0x31
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087189>] worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087222>] start_worker+0x26/0x42
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c8b261>] init_workqueues+0x2d2/0x59a
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c8af8f>] ? usermodehelper_init+0x8a/0x8a
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81000284>] do_one_initcall+0xce/0x272
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c6f650>] kernel_init+0x12e/0x3c1
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b9b74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b80b0>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c6f522>] ? start_kernel+0x737/0x737
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b9b70>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> 
> Yeah, I forgot to flip the WARN_ON_ONCE() condition so that it checks
> nr_running before looking at pool->nr_running.  The warning is
> spurious.  Will post fix soon.

I was wrong and am now dazed and confused.  That's from
init_workqueues() where only cpu0 is running.  How the hell did
nr_running manage to become non-zero at that point?  Can you please
apply the following patch and report the boot log?  Thank you.

---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -699,8 +699,10 @@ void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_str
 {
 	struct worker *worker = kthread_data(task);
 
-	if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
+	if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != worker->pool->gcwq->cpu);
 		atomic_inc(get_pool_nr_running(worker->pool));
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -730,6 +732,7 @@ struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(s
 
 	/* this can only happen on the local cpu */
 	BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != worker->pool->gcwq->cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * The counterpart of the following dec_and_test, implied mb,
@@ -3855,6 +3858,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 		for (i = 0; i < BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE; i++)
 			INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&gcwq->busy_hash[i]);
 
+		if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+			printk("XXX cpu=%d gcwq=%p base=%p\n", cpu, gcwq,
+			       per_cpu_ptr(&pool_nr_running, cpu));
+
 		for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
 			pool->gcwq = gcwq;
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->worklist);
@@ -3868,6 +3875,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 				    (unsigned long)pool);
 
 			ida_init(&pool->worker_ida);
+
+			printk("XXX cpu=%d nr_running=%d @ %p\n", gcwq->cpu,
+			       atomic_read(get_pool_nr_running(pool)),
+			       get_pool_nr_running(pool));
 		}
 
 		gcwq->trustee_state = TRUSTEE_DONE;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, elder@kernel.org, rni@google.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, marcel@holtmann.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vwadekar@nvidia.com,
	swhiteho@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, bpm@sgi.com,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, gustavo@padovan.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, joshhunt00@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, johan.hedberg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712214514.GD20167@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712170519.GA20167@google.com>

Hello, again.

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:05:19AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:06:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > [    0.207977] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/mm/kernel/workqueue.c:1217 worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b()
> > [    0.207977] Modules linked in:
> > [    0.207977] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6-08414-g9645fff #15
> > [    0.207977] Call Trace:
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087189>] ? worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff810559d9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xae/0xdb
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81055a2e>] warn_slowpath_null+0x28/0x31
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087189>] worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087222>] start_worker+0x26/0x42
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c8b261>] init_workqueues+0x2d2/0x59a
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c8af8f>] ? usermodehelper_init+0x8a/0x8a
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81000284>] do_one_initcall+0xce/0x272
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c6f650>] kernel_init+0x12e/0x3c1
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b9b74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b80b0>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c6f522>] ? start_kernel+0x737/0x737
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b9b70>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> 
> Yeah, I forgot to flip the WARN_ON_ONCE() condition so that it checks
> nr_running before looking at pool->nr_running.  The warning is
> spurious.  Will post fix soon.

I was wrong and am now dazed and confused.  That's from
init_workqueues() where only cpu0 is running.  How the hell did
nr_running manage to become non-zero at that point?  Can you please
apply the following patch and report the boot log?  Thank you.

---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -699,8 +699,10 @@ void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_str
 {
 	struct worker *worker = kthread_data(task);
 
-	if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
+	if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != worker->pool->gcwq->cpu);
 		atomic_inc(get_pool_nr_running(worker->pool));
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -730,6 +732,7 @@ struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(s
 
 	/* this can only happen on the local cpu */
 	BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != worker->pool->gcwq->cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * The counterpart of the following dec_and_test, implied mb,
@@ -3855,6 +3858,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 		for (i = 0; i < BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE; i++)
 			INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&gcwq->busy_hash[i]);
 
+		if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+			printk("XXX cpu=%d gcwq=%p base=%p\n", cpu, gcwq,
+			       per_cpu_ptr(&pool_nr_running, cpu));
+
 		for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
 			pool->gcwq = gcwq;
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->worklist);
@@ -3868,6 +3875,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 				    (unsigned long)pool);
 
 			ida_init(&pool->worker_ida);
+
+			printk("XXX cpu=%d nr_running=%d @ %p\n", gcwq->cpu,
+			       atomic_read(get_pool_nr_running(pool)),
+			       get_pool_nr_running(pool));
 		}
 
 		gcwq->trustee_state = TRUSTEE_DONE;

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	joshhunt00@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, rni@google.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, vwadekar@nvidia.com,
	herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, swhiteho@redhat.com, bpm@sgi.com,
	elder@kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, marcel@holtmann.org,
	gustavo@padovan.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712214514.GD20167@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712170519.GA20167@google.com>

Hello, again.

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:05:19AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:06:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > [    0.207977] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/mm/kernel/workqueue.c:1217 worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b()
> > [    0.207977] Modules linked in:
> > [    0.207977] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6-08414-g9645fff #15
> > [    0.207977] Call Trace:
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087189>] ? worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff810559d9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xae/0xdb
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81055a2e>] warn_slowpath_null+0x28/0x31
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087189>] worker_enter_idle+0x2b8/0x32b
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81087222>] start_worker+0x26/0x42
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c8b261>] init_workqueues+0x2d2/0x59a
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c8af8f>] ? usermodehelper_init+0x8a/0x8a
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81000284>] do_one_initcall+0xce/0x272
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c6f650>] kernel_init+0x12e/0x3c1
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b9b74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b80b0>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff81c6f522>] ? start_kernel+0x737/0x737
> > [    0.207977]  [<ffffffff814b9b70>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> 
> Yeah, I forgot to flip the WARN_ON_ONCE() condition so that it checks
> nr_running before looking at pool->nr_running.  The warning is
> spurious.  Will post fix soon.

I was wrong and am now dazed and confused.  That's from
init_workqueues() where only cpu0 is running.  How the hell did
nr_running manage to become non-zero at that point?  Can you please
apply the following patch and report the boot log?  Thank you.

---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -699,8 +699,10 @@ void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_str
 {
 	struct worker *worker = kthread_data(task);
 
-	if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
+	if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != worker->pool->gcwq->cpu);
 		atomic_inc(get_pool_nr_running(worker->pool));
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -730,6 +732,7 @@ struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(s
 
 	/* this can only happen on the local cpu */
 	BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != worker->pool->gcwq->cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * The counterpart of the following dec_and_test, implied mb,
@@ -3855,6 +3858,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 		for (i = 0; i < BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE; i++)
 			INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&gcwq->busy_hash[i]);
 
+		if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+			printk("XXX cpu=%d gcwq=%p base=%p\n", cpu, gcwq,
+			       per_cpu_ptr(&pool_nr_running, cpu));
+
 		for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
 			pool->gcwq = gcwq;
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->worklist);
@@ -3868,6 +3875,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 				    (unsigned long)pool);
 
 			ida_init(&pool->worker_ida);
+
+			printk("XXX cpu=%d nr_running=%d @ %p\n", gcwq->cpu,
+			       atomic_read(get_pool_nr_running(pool)),
+			       get_pool_nr_running(pool));
 		}
 
 		gcwq->trustee_state = TRUSTEE_DONE;

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-09 18:41 [PATCHSET] workqueue: reimplement high priority using a separate worker pool Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <1341859315-17759-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-09 18:41   ` [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: don't use WQ_HIGHPRI for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: factor out worker_pool from global_cwq Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-10  4:48   ` Namhyung Kim
2012-07-10  4:48     ` Namhyung Kim
2012-07-10  4:48     ` Namhyung Kim
2012-07-12 17:07     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 17:07       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 17:07       ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]   ` <1341859315-17759-3-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 21:49     ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 21:49       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 21:49       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where applicable Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]   ` <1341859315-17759-4-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-10 23:30     ` Tony Luck
2012-07-10 23:30       ` Tony Luck
2012-07-10 23:30       ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 17:06       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 17:06         ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 17:06         ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: separate out worker_pool flags Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:55   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:55     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:55     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  4:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-14  4:27       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-14  4:27       ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]       ` <CA+55aFyeauqCqrWsx4U2TB2ENrugZXYj+4vw3Fd0kGaeWBP3RA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-14  4:44         ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  4:44           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  4:44           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:00           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-14  5:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-14  5:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-14  5:07             ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:07               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:07               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-16 19:31             ` Peter Seebach
     [not found]   ` <1341859315-17759-6-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-14  5:21     ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:21       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:21       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]   ` <1341859315-17759-7-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 13:06     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-12 13:06       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-12 13:06       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-12 17:05       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 17:05         ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 17:05         ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 21:45         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-07-12 21:45           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 21:45           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 22:16           ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 22:16             ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 22:16             ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 22:32             ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 22:32               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 22:32               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 23:24               ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 23:24                 ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 23:24                 ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 23:36                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 23:36                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 23:36                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 23:46                   ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 23:46                     ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 23:46                     ` Tony Luck
2012-07-13 17:51                     ` Tony Luck
2012-07-13 17:51                       ` Tony Luck
2012-07-13 17:51                       ` Tony Luck
2012-07-13  2:08           ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-13  2:08             ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-13  2:08             ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-14  3:41             ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:41               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:41               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:56   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:56     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:56     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  8:18     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-14  8:18       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-14  8:18       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-14  5:24   ` [PATCH UPDATED v3 " Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:24     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:24     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120712214514.GD20167@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=joshhunt00@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=rni@google.com \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=vwadekar@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.