From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:16:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207191116.27273.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz>
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch has
> now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to
> assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt?
>
> I'd like to try and have basic device tree support added for the next merge
> window (or this one if it all goes well :) ), but it relies on the vendor binding being
> formalized.
What about devices that come from via though? Anything that first showed up
in vt8500 or earlier should probably get a prefix identifying VIA rather
than WonderMedia.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:16:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207191116.27273.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B-A1+cU8XkcJSYgi1/3OOQJ8krCUz0bFs7@public.gmane.org>
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch has
> now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to
> assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt?
>
> I'd like to try and have basic device tree support added for the next merge
> window (or this one if it all goes well :) ), but it relies on the vendor binding being
> formalized.
What about devices that come from via though? Anything that first showed up
in vt8500 or earlier should probably get a prefix identifying VIA rather
than WonderMedia.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com
Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:16:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207191116.27273.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz>
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch has
> now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to
> assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt?
>
> I'd like to try and have basic device tree support added for the next merge
> window (or this one if it all goes well :) ), but it relies on the vendor binding being
> formalized.
What about devices that come from via though? Anything that first showed up
in vt8500 or earlier should probably get a prefix identifying VIA rather
than WonderMedia.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-17 7:11 [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt Tony Prisk
2012-07-17 7:11 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-17 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-17 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-17 13:30 ` Alexey Charkov
2012-07-17 13:30 ` Alexey Charkov
2012-07-19 4:56 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 4:56 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 11:16 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-07-19 11:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-19 11:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-19 11:45 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 11:45 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 11:45 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 12:12 ` Alexey Charkov
2012-07-19 12:12 ` Alexey Charkov
2012-07-19 12:19 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 12:19 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 12:19 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-19 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-19 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-19 12:39 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 12:39 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 12:39 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-19 12:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-19 12:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-17 13:47 ` Tony Prisk
2012-07-17 13:47 ` Tony Prisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207191116.27273.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.