All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:28:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120722202843.GQ2435@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207221940.51764.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 07:40:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 22, 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 03:08:40AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:37:14PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:52:43AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:41:56PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not
> > > > > > +used [-Wunused-variable]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This patch silences this error.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > > index 8856102..18347aa 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > > @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> > > > > >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > > > > >  static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
> > > > > > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */
> > > > > 
> > > > > __maybe_unused ?
> > > > 
> > > > Are the compiler and linker smart enough to get rid of the storage in
> > > > case it really isn't used?  (Not that the storage for a bool is worth
> > > > worrying about, but...)
> > > 
> > > GCC with optimization enabled will get rid of the storage even without
> > > __maybe_unused.
> > 
> > OK, that should allow me to get rid of a few ifdefs, then!  For this one,
> > please see below.
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error
> > 
> > A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error:
> > 
> > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not
> > +used [-Wunused-variable]
> > 
> > This patch silences this error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> 
> Well, I prefer the one below.

Works for me!

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Subject: ACPI / PM: Fix build warning in sleep.c for CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP unset
> 
> If CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is unset, the compiler complains that
> pwr_btn_event_pending is defined but not used.  To silence the
> warning, move the definition of pwr_btn_event_pending under an
> apprporiate #ifdef.
> 
> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sleep.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
>  
>  static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> -static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
>  
>  static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
>  {
> @@ -110,6 +109,7 @@ static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_s
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
>  static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
> +static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
>  
>  /*
>   * The ACPI specification wants us to save NVS memory regions during hibernation
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:28:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120722202843.GQ2435@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207221940.51764.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 07:40:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 22, 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 03:08:40AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:37:14PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:52:43AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:41:56PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not
> > > > > > +used [-Wunused-variable]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This patch silences this error.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > > index 8856102..18347aa 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > > @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> > > > > >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > > > > >  static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
> > > > > > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */
> > > > > 
> > > > > __maybe_unused ?
> > > > 
> > > > Are the compiler and linker smart enough to get rid of the storage in
> > > > case it really isn't used?  (Not that the storage for a bool is worth
> > > > worrying about, but...)
> > > 
> > > GCC with optimization enabled will get rid of the storage even without
> > > __maybe_unused.
> > 
> > OK, that should allow me to get rid of a few ifdefs, then!  For this one,
> > please see below.
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error
> > 
> > A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error:
> > 
> > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not
> > +used [-Wunused-variable]
> > 
> > This patch silences this error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> 
> Well, I prefer the one below.

Works for me!

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Subject: ACPI / PM: Fix build warning in sleep.c for CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP unset
> 
> If CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is unset, the compiler complains that
> pwr_btn_event_pending is defined but not used.  To silence the
> warning, move the definition of pwr_btn_event_pending under an
> apprporiate #ifdef.
> 
> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sleep.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
>  
>  static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> -static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
>  
>  static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
>  {
> @@ -110,6 +109,7 @@ static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_s
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
>  static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
> +static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
>  
>  /*
>   * The ACPI specification wants us to save NVS memory regions during hibernation
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-22 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-21 21:41 [PATCH] acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-21 21:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-21 21:52 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-21 23:37   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-22  0:08     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-22  4:10       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-22  4:10         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-22 17:40         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-22 17:40           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-22 20:28           ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-07-22 20:28             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-23 18:58             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-23 18:58               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-23 19:01             ` [Resend][PATCH] ACPI / PM: Fix build warning in sleep.c for CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP unset Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-23 19:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-26 23:28                 ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120722202843.GQ2435@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.