From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org,
nicolas.ferre@atmel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:23:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207241623.01588.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343136606-8874-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com wrote:
> I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
> Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
> cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
>
> I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
> documented and it will concern all drivers.
I just looked at the patches for the first time, but it looks all great, so
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
> isn't it?
> By the way, I have updated documentation in patch 1/4 in the same way as you
> did with the patch 'mmc: dt: Deduplicate binding docs by referencing mmc.txt'.
> I didn't remove common properties from slot part because I think it is not
> obvious to use these properties into the slot node.
If you want to take it all through the mmc tree, that's also fine with me.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:23:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207241623.01588.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343136606-8874-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
> I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
> Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
> cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
>
> I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
> documented and it will concern all drivers.
I just looked at the patches for the first time, but it looks all great, so
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
> isn't it?
> By the way, I have updated documentation in patch 1/4 in the same way as you
> did with the patch 'mmc: dt: Deduplicate binding docs by referencing mmc.txt'.
> I didn't remove common properties from slot part because I think it is not
> obvious to use these properties into the slot node.
If you want to take it all through the mmc tree, that's also fine with me.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-24 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 13:30 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmc: atmel-mci: add " ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: at91: add clocks for DT entries ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: add nodes for atmel hsmci controllers for atmel SOCs ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: add nodes for atmel hsmci controllers for atmel boards ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-07-24 16:23 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 3:14 ` Chris Ball
2012-08-08 3:14 ` Chris Ball
2012-08-09 6:32 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-08-09 6:32 ` ludovic.desroches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207241623.01588.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.