From: ludovic.desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com,
ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:32:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50235964.2080409@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hasexegg.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>
Le 08/08/2012 05:14 AM, Chris Ball a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com wrote:
>> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
>> Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
>> cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
>
> In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
> receive into the patches when you resend them. Thanks!
>
Ok.
>> I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
>> documented and it will concern all drivers.
>
> Agreed. It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.
>
>> Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
>> isn't it?
>
> Yes, let's do that. I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
> can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.
Thanks Chris.
Ludovic
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:32:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50235964.2080409@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hasexegg.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>
Le 08/08/2012 05:14 AM, Chris Ball a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
>> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
>> Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
>> cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
>
> In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
> receive into the patches when you resend them. Thanks!
>
Ok.
>> I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
>> documented and it will concern all drivers.
>
> Agreed. It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.
>
>> Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
>> isn't it?
>
> Yes, let's do that. I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
> can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.
Thanks Chris.
Ludovic
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-09 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 13:30 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmc: atmel-mci: add " ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: at91: add clocks for DT entries ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: add nodes for atmel hsmci controllers for atmel SOCs ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: add nodes for atmel hsmci controllers for atmel boards ludovic.desroches
2012-07-24 13:30 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-07-24 16:23 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-24 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 3:14 ` Chris Ball
2012-08-08 3:14 ` Chris Ball
2012-08-09 6:32 ` ludovic.desroches [this message]
2012-08-09 6:32 ` ludovic.desroches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50235964.2080409@atmel.com \
--to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.