All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:01:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120807170129.GA3759@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120806160226.GF29272@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:02:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > > > +	ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf;
> > > > +	ponkey->irq_dbr = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr) : irq_dbr;
> 
> > > Why this isn't done inside ab8500_irq_get_virq()?
> 
> > There's no reason why it can't be.
> 
> > My first version of the patch did just that in fact.
> 
> > Would that be your preference?
> 
> Restating my comment elsewhere...  why do we even need to do this in
> _get_virq() - I'd *really* expect this to be handled by the irq domain
> code.

Okay, so I've just spent a small amount of time looking at this. I think
the best place for this would be in *_get_virq(), using the same logic that
selected a *_legacy or *_linear domain in the first place. The only thing 
the domain can test for is the 'type' of domain and the requested IRQ. This
is where the issue lies. If a hwirq to virq conversion is requested, but a
virq is passed (which happens in the non-DT case) a WARN() is triggered
because the irq passed is bigger than first_irq + size. I think *_get_virq()
should ensure that only a hwirq is passed to irq_create_mapping().

Let me know if you had other ideas.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:01:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120807170129.GA3759@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120806160226.GF29272@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:02:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > > > +	ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf;
> > > > +	ponkey->irq_dbr = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr) : irq_dbr;
> 
> > > Why this isn't done inside ab8500_irq_get_virq()?
> 
> > There's no reason why it can't be.
> 
> > My first version of the patch did just that in fact.
> 
> > Would that be your preference?
> 
> Restating my comment elsewhere...  why do we even need to do this in
> _get_virq() - I'd *really* expect this to be handled by the irq domain
> code.

Okay, so I've just spent a small amount of time looking at this. I think
the best place for this would be in *_get_virq(), using the same logic that
selected a *_legacy or *_linear domain in the first place. The only thing 
the domain can test for is the 'type' of domain and the requested IRQ. This
is where the issue lies. If a hwirq to virq conversion is requested, but a
virq is passed (which happens in the non-DT case) a WARN() is triggered
because the irq passed is bigger than first_irq + size. I think *_get_virq()
should ensure that only a hwirq is passed to irq_create_mapping().

Let me know if you had other ideas.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:01:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120807170129.GA3759@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120806160226.GF29272@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:02:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > > > +	ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf;
> > > > +	ponkey->irq_dbr = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr) : irq_dbr;
> 
> > > Why this isn't done inside ab8500_irq_get_virq()?
> 
> > There's no reason why it can't be.
> 
> > My first version of the patch did just that in fact.
> 
> > Would that be your preference?
> 
> Restating my comment elsewhere...  why do we even need to do this in
> _get_virq() - I'd *really* expect this to be handled by the irq domain
> code.

Okay, so I've just spent a small amount of time looking at this. I think
the best place for this would be in *_get_virq(), using the same logic that
selected a *_legacy or *_linear domain in the first place. The only thing 
the domain can test for is the 'type' of domain and the requested IRQ. This
is where the issue lies. If a hwirq to virq conversion is requested, but a
virq is passed (which happens in the non-DT case) a WARN() is triggered
because the irq passed is bigger than first_irq + size. I think *_get_virq()
should ensure that only a hwirq is passed to irq_create_mapping().

Let me know if you had other ideas.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-07 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-06 12:32 [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots Lee Jones
2012-08-06 12:32 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-06  8:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-08-06  8:19   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-08-06 15:37   ` Lee Jones
2012-08-06 15:37     ` Lee Jones
2012-08-06 15:37     ` Lee Jones
2012-08-06 16:02     ` Mark Brown
2012-08-06 16:02       ` Mark Brown
2012-08-06 17:24       ` Lee Jones
2012-08-06 17:24         ` Lee Jones
2012-08-06 17:24         ` Lee Jones
2012-08-07 17:01       ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-08-07 17:01         ` Lee Jones
2012-08-07 17:01         ` Lee Jones
2012-08-07 17:03         ` Mark Brown
2012-08-07 17:03           ` Mark Brown
2012-08-08  7:35           ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08  7:35             ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08  7:35             ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08  8:04           ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08  8:04             ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08  8:04             ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08  8:28             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08  8:28               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08  9:59               ` Mark Brown
2012-08-08  9:59                 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-08  9:49             ` Mark Brown
2012-08-08  9:49               ` Mark Brown
2012-08-08 11:40               ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08 11:40                 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-08 13:17                 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-08 13:17                   ` Mark Brown
2012-09-13  9:35 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-13  9:35   ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14  8:03   ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14  8:03     ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14  8:03     ` Lee Jones
2012-09-18 11:22     ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-18 11:22       ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-19 17:11       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-09-19 17:11         ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120807170129.GA3759@gmail.com \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.