All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: shuah.khan@hp.com
Cc: "Christoph Lameter (Open Source)" <cl@linux.com>,
	penberg@kernel.org, glommer@parallels.com, js1304@gmail.com,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	shuahkhan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:53:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120815165324.f6e16eee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344789618.5128.5.camel@lorien2>

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:40:18 -0600
Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@hp.com> wrote:

> kmem_cache_create() does cache integrity checks when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> is defined. These checks interspersed with the regular code path has
> lead to compile time warnings when compiled without CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> defined. Restructuring the code to move the integrity checks in to a new
> function would eliminate the current compile warning problem and also
> will allow for future changes to the debug only code to evolve without
> introducing new warnings in the regular path. This restructuring work
> is based on the discussion in the following thread:

Your patch appears to be against some ancient old kernel, such as 3.5. 
I did this:

--- a/mm/slab_common.c~mm-slab_commonc-restructure-kmem_cache_create-to-move-debug-cache-integrity-checks-into-a-new-function-fix
+++ a/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -101,15 +101,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con
 
 	get_online_cpus();
 	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
-
-	if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size))
-		goto oops;
-
-	s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
-oops:
-#endif
+	if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size) == 0)
+		s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
 	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
 	put_online_cpus();
 
_

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: shuah.khan@hp.com
Cc: "Christoph Lameter (Open Source)" <cl@linux.com>,
	penberg@kernel.org, glommer@parallels.com, js1304@gmail.com,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	shuahkhan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:53:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120815165324.f6e16eee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344789618.5128.5.camel@lorien2>

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:40:18 -0600
Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@hp.com> wrote:

> kmem_cache_create() does cache integrity checks when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> is defined. These checks interspersed with the regular code path has
> lead to compile time warnings when compiled without CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> defined. Restructuring the code to move the integrity checks in to a new
> function would eliminate the current compile warning problem and also
> will allow for future changes to the debug only code to evolve without
> introducing new warnings in the regular path. This restructuring work
> is based on the discussion in the following thread:

Your patch appears to be against some ancient old kernel, such as 3.5. 
I did this:

--- a/mm/slab_common.c~mm-slab_commonc-restructure-kmem_cache_create-to-move-debug-cache-integrity-checks-into-a-new-function-fix
+++ a/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -101,15 +101,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con
 
 	get_online_cpus();
 	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
-
-	if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size))
-		goto oops;
-
-	s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
-oops:
-#endif
+	if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size) == 0)
+		s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
 	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
 	put_online_cpus();
 
_


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-15 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-13 23:12 [PATCH TRIVIAL] mm: Fix build warning in kmem_cache_create() Shuah Khan
2012-07-13 23:12 ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-14  9:18 ` David Rientjes
2012-07-14  9:18   ` David Rientjes
2012-07-14 12:01   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-14 12:01     ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-16  3:04     ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-16  3:04       ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-16  9:58       ` David Rientjes
2012-07-16  9:58         ` David Rientjes
2012-07-16 14:17         ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-16 14:17           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-16 15:56           ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-16 15:56             ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-16 19:58           ` David Rientjes
2012-07-16 19:58             ` David Rientjes
2012-07-16 20:14             ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-16 20:14               ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-16 23:48               ` David Rientjes
2012-07-16 23:48                 ` David Rientjes
2012-07-17 14:36                 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-17 14:36                   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-17 14:46                   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-17 14:46                     ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-17 15:11                     ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-17 15:11                       ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-23  7:04                       ` Glauber Costa
2012-07-23  7:04                         ` Glauber Costa
2012-07-25 15:28                         ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-25 15:28                           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-17 16:52                     ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-17 16:52                       ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-30 10:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-30 10:18   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-30 19:56   ` David Rientjes
2012-07-30 19:56     ` David Rientjes
2012-07-30 20:41     ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-30 20:41       ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-31  2:07       ` David Rientjes
2012-07-31  2:07         ` David Rientjes
2012-07-31  6:05         ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-31  6:05           ` Pekka Enberg
2012-08-06  3:41   ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-06  3:41     ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 15:14     ` [PATCH RESEND] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 15:14       ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 16:49       ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-08-06 16:49         ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-08-06 17:03         ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 17:03           ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 21:13           ` [PATCH v2] " Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 21:13             ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 14:06             ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 14:06               ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 14:13             ` Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-09 14:13               ` Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-09 17:01               ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 17:01                 ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 19:08                 ` Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-09 19:08                   ` Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-09 19:33                   ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 19:33                     ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-12 16:40                     ` [PATCH v3] " Shuah Khan
2012-08-12 16:40                       ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-12 17:36                       ` Christoph
2012-08-12 17:36                         ` Christoph
2012-08-15 23:53                       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-08-15 23:53                         ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-16  6:40                         ` Pekka Enberg
2012-08-16  6:40                           ` Pekka Enberg
2012-08-08 14:14           ` [PATCH RESEND] " Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-08 14:14             ` Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-08 15:13             ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-08 15:13               ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120815165324.f6e16eee.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shuah.khan@hp.com \
    --cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.