All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc: Uprobes port to powerpc
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:30:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120816050030.GA12060@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345066913.11751.4.camel@pasglop>

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:41:53AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 18:59 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 07/26, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > This is the port of uprobes to powerpc. Usage is similar to x86.
> > 
> > I am just curious why this series was ignored by powerpc maintainers...
> 
> Because it arrived too late for the previous merge window considering my
> limited bandwidth for reviewing things and that nobody else seems to
> have reviewed it :-)
> 
> It's still on track for the next one, and I'm hoping to dedicate most of
> next week going through patches & doing a powerpc -next.

Thanks Ben!

> > Of course I can not review this code, I know nothing about powerpc,
> > but the patches look simple/straightforward.
> > 
> > Paul, Benjamin?
> > 
> > Just one question... Shouldn't arch_uprobe_pre_xol() forbid to probe
> > UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (at least) ?
> > 
> > (I assume that emulate_step() can't handle this case but of course I
> >  do not understand arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c)
> > 
> > Note that uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() sets utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT
> > without any checks. This doesn't look right if it was UTASK_SSTEP...
> > 
> > But again, I do not know what powepc will actually do if we try to
> > single-step over UPROBE_SWBP_INSN.
> 
> Ananth ?

set_swbp() will return -EEXIST to install_breakpoint if we are trying to
put a breakpoint on UPROBE_SWBP_INSN. So, the arch agnostic code itself
takes care of this case... or am I missing something?

However, I see that we need a powerpc specific is_swbp_insn()
implementation since we will have to take care of all the trap variants.

I will need to update the patches based on changes being made by Oleg
and Sebastien for the single-step issues. Will incorporate the powerpc
specific is_swbp_insn() change along with the changes required for the
single-step part and send out the next version.

Ananth

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	michael@ellerman.id.au, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	peterz@infradead.org,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc: Uprobes port to powerpc
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:30:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120816050030.GA12060@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345066913.11751.4.camel@pasglop>

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:41:53AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 18:59 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 07/26, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > This is the port of uprobes to powerpc. Usage is similar to x86.
> > 
> > I am just curious why this series was ignored by powerpc maintainers...
> 
> Because it arrived too late for the previous merge window considering my
> limited bandwidth for reviewing things and that nobody else seems to
> have reviewed it :-)
> 
> It's still on track for the next one, and I'm hoping to dedicate most of
> next week going through patches & doing a powerpc -next.

Thanks Ben!

> > Of course I can not review this code, I know nothing about powerpc,
> > but the patches look simple/straightforward.
> > 
> > Paul, Benjamin?
> > 
> > Just one question... Shouldn't arch_uprobe_pre_xol() forbid to probe
> > UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (at least) ?
> > 
> > (I assume that emulate_step() can't handle this case but of course I
> >  do not understand arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c)
> > 
> > Note that uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() sets utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT
> > without any checks. This doesn't look right if it was UTASK_SSTEP...
> > 
> > But again, I do not know what powepc will actually do if we try to
> > single-step over UPROBE_SWBP_INSN.
> 
> Ananth ?

set_swbp() will return -EEXIST to install_breakpoint if we are trying to
put a breakpoint on UPROBE_SWBP_INSN. So, the arch agnostic code itself
takes care of this case... or am I missing something?

However, I see that we need a powerpc specific is_swbp_insn()
implementation since we will have to take care of all the trap variants.

I will need to update the patches based on changes being made by Oleg
and Sebastien for the single-step issues. Will incorporate the powerpc
specific is_swbp_insn() change along with the changes required for the
single-step part and send out the next version.

Ananth


  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-16  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26  5:19 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Add trap_nr to thread_struct Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-26  5:19 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-26  5:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc: Uprobes port to powerpc Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-26  5:20   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-27  8:40   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-27  8:40     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-08-15 16:59   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-15 16:59     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-15 21:41     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-08-15 21:41       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-08-16  5:00       ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2012-08-16  5:00         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-16 15:21         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-16 15:21           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-17  5:13           ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-17  5:13             ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-17 15:00             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-17 15:00               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-21 11:24               ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-21 11:24                 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-21 13:09                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-21 13:09                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-22  8:32                   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-08-22  8:32                     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120816050030.GA12060@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.