From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: vitalywool-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kevin.wells-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org,
srinivas.bakki-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org,
aletes.xgr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] i2c: pnx: Fix read transactions of >= 2 bytes
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:52:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120818095212.GC24812@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344411752-23469-2-git-send-email-stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1367 bytes --]
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:42:32AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On transactions with n>=2 bytes, the controller actually wrongly clocks in n+1
> bytes. This is caused by the (wrong) assumption that RFE in the Status Register
> is 1 iff there is no byte already ordered (via a dummy TX byte). This lead to
> the implementation of synchronized byte ordering, e.g.:
>
> Dummy-TX - RX - Dummy-TX - RX - ...
>
> But since RFE actually stays high after some Dummy-TX, it rather looks like:
>
> Dummy-TX - Dummy-TX - RX - Dummy-TX - RX - (RX)
>
> The last RX byte is clocked in by the bus controller, but ignored by the kernel
> when filling the userspace buffer.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by asking for RX via Dummy-TX asynchronously.
> Introducing a separate counter for TX bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> ---
> Applies to v3.6-rc1
>
> This patch for i2c-pnx affects PNX4008 and LPC32xx (and LPC31xx, not yet in
> mainline). Can you please test?
>
> Thanks in advance!
I assume you checked this on LPC32xx? I'll wait a bit more but tend to
take the patch anyhow, even if there is no explicit ACK from PNX.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: vitalywool@gmail.com, khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com,
srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, aletes.xgr@gmail.com, jonsmirl@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] i2c: pnx: Fix read transactions of >= 2 bytes
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:52:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120818095212.GC24812@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344411752-23469-2-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:42:32AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On transactions with n>=2 bytes, the controller actually wrongly clocks in n+1
> bytes. This is caused by the (wrong) assumption that RFE in the Status Register
> is 1 iff there is no byte already ordered (via a dummy TX byte). This lead to
> the implementation of synchronized byte ordering, e.g.:
>
> Dummy-TX - RX - Dummy-TX - RX - ...
>
> But since RFE actually stays high after some Dummy-TX, it rather looks like:
>
> Dummy-TX - Dummy-TX - RX - Dummy-TX - RX - (RX)
>
> The last RX byte is clocked in by the bus controller, but ignored by the kernel
> when filling the userspace buffer.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by asking for RX via Dummy-TX asynchronously.
> Introducing a separate counter for TX bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
>
> ---
> Applies to v3.6-rc1
>
> This patch for i2c-pnx affects PNX4008 and LPC32xx (and LPC31xx, not yet in
> mainline). Can you please test?
>
> Thanks in advance!
I assume you checked this on LPC32xx? I'll wait a bit more but tend to
take the patch anyhow, even if there is no explicit ACK from PNX.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-18 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-08 7:42 [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <1344411752-23469-1-git-send-email-stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-08 7:42 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] i2c: pnx: Fix read transactions of >= 2 bytes Roland Stigge
2012-08-08 7:42 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <1344411752-23469-2-git-send-email-stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-18 9:52 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-08-18 9:52 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120818095212.GC24812-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-19 8:45 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-19 8:45 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-18 9:51 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions Wolfram Sang
2012-08-18 9:51 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120818095108.GB24812-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-19 8:47 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-19 8:47 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <5030A81E.5090508-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-20 16:26 ` Kevin Wells
2012-08-20 16:26 ` Kevin Wells
[not found] ` <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F823A0354A3D-SIPbe8o7cfX8DdpCu65jn8FrZmdRls4ZQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-20 16:47 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-20 16:47 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-20 16:47 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <50326A3E.9070607-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-20 19:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-20 19:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-20 19:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-20 17:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-08-20 17:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-08-20 20:47 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <20120820175527.GA9169-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-03 20:16 ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-03 20:16 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <50451016.7010608-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 9:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-04 9:20 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120818095212.GC24812@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=aletes.xgr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kevin.wells-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=srinivas.bakki-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vitalywool-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.