Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

[Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:54PM +0200, Kevin Wells wrote:
> >>> This patch for i2c-pnx affects PNX4008 and LPC32xx (and LPC31xx,
> >>> not yet in mainline). Can you please test and double-check the
> >>> manuals of PNX4008 and LPC31xx? I only found this via the manual
> >>> of LPC32xx but assume it's the same for the others, also.
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks in advance!
> >> 
> >> Kevin, since the other manuals seem to be not easily available, can
> >> you please check?
> >
> >Yes, would be great if someone at NXP could confirm that PNX actually
> >uses the same IP core for the I2C controller as LPCs do (which is
> >currently assumed by Linux anyway).
> 
> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do believe they
> are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a number of NXP/Phillips
> chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't think there are any PNX4008's in
> the wild, and even working in NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference
> material for that part (including the user manual).

Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then.

Roland, this looks like 3.6-material?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]