All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Chris Ball <cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam
	<fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Mark Brown
	<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mxs/spi: Fix misuse of init_completion
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:54:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208240454.40561.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87393dt3em.fsf-DGHOrqG7t0YzNDMTQreKSUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>

Dear Chris Ball,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23 2012, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > The init_completion() call does reinit not only the variable carrying
> > the flag that the completion finished, but also initialized the
> > waitqueue associated with the completion. On the contrary, the
> > INIT_WAITQUEUE() call only reinits the flag.

Darn, it's INIT_COMPLETION() of course.

> > In case there was anything still stuck in the waitqueue, subsequent call
> > to init_completion() would be able to create possible race condition.
> > This patch uses the proper function and moves init_completion() into
> > .probe() call of the driver, to be issued only once.
> > 
> > Note that such scenario is impossible, since two threads can never enter
> > the mxs_spi_txrx_dma(), since whole this section is protected by mutex
> > in SPI core. This by no means allows this issue to exit though.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Thanks for writing that up -- I appreciate seeing the explanation of the
> problems this could have caused.

You're very welcome, I was really lazy, sorry about that and thanks for pushing 
me ;-) I hope someone might eventually even find this explanation useful.

> - Chris.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] mxs/spi: Fix misuse of init_completion
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:54:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208240454.40561.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87393dt3em.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>

Dear Chris Ball,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23 2012, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > The init_completion() call does reinit not only the variable carrying
> > the flag that the completion finished, but also initialized the
> > waitqueue associated with the completion. On the contrary, the
> > INIT_WAITQUEUE() call only reinits the flag.

Darn, it's INIT_COMPLETION() of course.

> > In case there was anything still stuck in the waitqueue, subsequent call
> > to init_completion() would be able to create possible race condition.
> > This patch uses the proper function and moves init_completion() into
> > .probe() call of the driver, to be issued only once.
> > 
> > Note that such scenario is impossible, since two threads can never enter
> > the mxs_spi_txrx_dma(), since whole this section is protected by mutex
> > in SPI core. This by no means allows this issue to exit though.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> 
> Thanks for writing that up -- I appreciate seeing the explanation of the
> problems this could have caused.

You're very welcome, I was really lazy, sorry about that and thanks for pushing 
me ;-) I hope someone might eventually even find this explanation useful.

> - Chris.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-24  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-24  2:33 [PATCH V2] mxs/spi: Fix misuse of init_completion Marek Vasut
2012-08-24  2:33 ` Marek Vasut
     [not found] ` <1345775624-9696-1-git-send-email-marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-24  2:44   ` Chris Ball
2012-08-24  2:44     ` Chris Ball
     [not found]     ` <87393dt3em.fsf-DGHOrqG7t0YzNDMTQreKSUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-24  2:54       ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-08-24  2:54         ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208240454.40561.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marek.vasut-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.