From: Chris Ball <cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam
<fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Mark Brown
<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mxs/spi: Fix misuse of init_completion
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:44:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87393dt3em.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345775624-9696-1-git-send-email-marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org> (Marek Vasut's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:33:44 +0200")
Hi Marek,
On Thu, Aug 23 2012, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The init_completion() call does reinit not only the variable carrying
> the flag that the completion finished, but also initialized the
> waitqueue associated with the completion. On the contrary, the
> INIT_WAITQUEUE() call only reinits the flag.
>
> In case there was anything still stuck in the waitqueue, subsequent call
> to init_completion() would be able to create possible race condition. This
> patch uses the proper function and moves init_completion() into .probe() call
> of the driver, to be issued only once.
>
> Note that such scenario is impossible, since two threads can never enter the
> mxs_spi_txrx_dma(), since whole this section is protected by mutex in SPI core.
> This by no means allows this issue to exit though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Thanks for writing that up -- I appreciate seeing the explanation of the
problems this could have caused.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] mxs/spi: Fix misuse of init_completion
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:44:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87393dt3em.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345775624-9696-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> (Marek Vasut's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:33:44 +0200")
Hi Marek,
On Thu, Aug 23 2012, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The init_completion() call does reinit not only the variable carrying
> the flag that the completion finished, but also initialized the
> waitqueue associated with the completion. On the contrary, the
> INIT_WAITQUEUE() call only reinits the flag.
>
> In case there was anything still stuck in the waitqueue, subsequent call
> to init_completion() would be able to create possible race condition. This
> patch uses the proper function and moves init_completion() into .probe() call
> of the driver, to be issued only once.
>
> Note that such scenario is impossible, since two threads can never enter the
> mxs_spi_txrx_dma(), since whole this section is protected by mutex in SPI core.
> This by no means allows this issue to exit though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Thanks for writing that up -- I appreciate seeing the explanation of the
problems this could have caused.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-24 2:33 [PATCH V2] mxs/spi: Fix misuse of init_completion Marek Vasut
2012-08-24 2:33 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <1345775624-9696-1-git-send-email-marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-24 2:44 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2012-08-24 2:44 ` Chris Ball
[not found] ` <87393dt3em.fsf-DGHOrqG7t0YzNDMTQreKSUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-24 2:54 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-24 2:54 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87393dt3em.fsf@octavius.laptop.org \
--to=cjb-2x9k7bc8m7mdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.