From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:53:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208252353.59345.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
Until now the Exynos-SoC was the only Samsung-SoC supporting the GPIOs
via the device tree. This patch implements dt-support for the
s3c24xx arches.
The controllers contain only 3 cells, as the underlying gpio controller
does not support controlling the drive strength on a gpio level.
Tested with the gpio-keys driver on a s3c2416 based machine.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt | 38 ++++++++++++
drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
index 5375625..ce6a7d4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
@@ -39,3 +39,41 @@ Example:
#gpio-cells = <4>;
gpio-controller;
};
+
+
+Samsung S3C24XX GPIO Controller
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Compatible property value should be "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio".
+
+- reg: Physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
+ region.
+
+- #gpio-cells: Should be 3. The syntax of the gpio specifier used by client nodes
+ should be the following with values derived from the SoC user manual.
+ <[phandle of the gpio controller node]
+ [pin number within the gpio controller]
+ [mux function]
+ [flags and pull up/down]
+
+ Values for gpio specifier:
+ - Pin number: depending on the controller a number from 0 up to 15.
+ - Flags and Pull Up/Down: 0 - Pull Up/Down Disabled.
+ 1 - Pull Down Enabled.
+ 3 - Pull Up Enabled.
+ Bit 16 (0x00010000) - Input is active low.
+
+- gpio-controller: Specifies that the node is a gpio controller.
+- #address-cells: should be 1.
+- #size-cells: should be 1.
+
+Example:
+
+ gpa: gpio-controller@56000000 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
+ reg = <0x56000000 0x10>;
+ #gpio-cells = <3>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ };
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index a150d2e..80a2817 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -938,6 +938,67 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
s3c_gpiolib_track(chip);
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX) && defined(CONFIG_OF)
+static int s3c24xx_gpio_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags)
+{
+ unsigned int pin;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(gc->of_gpio_n_cells < 3))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(gpiospec->args_count < gc->of_gpio_n_cells))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (gpiospec->args[0] > gc->ngpio)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ pin = gc->base + gpiospec->args[0];
+
+ if (s3c_gpio_cfgpin(pin, S3C_GPIO_SFN(gpiospec->args[1])))
+ pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin function\n");
+ if (s3c_gpio_setpull(pin, gpiospec->args[2] & 0xffff))
+ pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin pull up/down\n");
+
+ if (flags)
+ *flags = gpiospec->args[2] >> 16;
+
+ return gpiospec->args[0];
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match[] __initdata = {
+ { .compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio", },
+ {}
+};
+
+static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
+ u64 base, u64 offset)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = &chip->chip;
+ u64 address;
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ return;
+
+ address = chip->base ? base + ((u32)chip->base & 0xfff) : base + offset;
+ gc->of_node = of_find_matching_node_by_address(NULL,
+ s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match, address);
+ if (!gc->of_node) {
+ pr_info("gpio: device tree node not found for gpio controller"
+ " with base address %08llx\n", address);
+ return;
+ }
+ gc->of_gpio_n_cells = 3;
+ gc->of_xlate = s3c24xx_gpio_xlate;
+}
+#elif defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)
+static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
+ u64 base, u64 offset)
+{
+ return;
+}
+#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX) && defined(CONFIG_OF) */
+
static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
int nr_chips, void __iomem *base)
{
@@ -962,6 +1023,8 @@ static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
gc->direction_output = samsung_gpiolib_2bit_output;
samsung_gpiolib_add(chip);
+
+ s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(chip, S3C24XX_PA_GPIO, i * 0x10);
}
}
--
1.7.2.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Landley <rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>,
Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij-0IS4wlFg1OjSUeElwK9/Pw@public.gmane.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Abraham
<thomas.abraham-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:53:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208252353.59345.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
Until now the Exynos-SoC was the only Samsung-SoC supporting the GPIOs
via the device tree. This patch implements dt-support for the
s3c24xx arches.
The controllers contain only 3 cells, as the underlying gpio controller
does not support controlling the drive strength on a gpio level.
Tested with the gpio-keys driver on a s3c2416 based machine.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt | 38 ++++++++++++
drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
index 5375625..ce6a7d4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
@@ -39,3 +39,41 @@ Example:
#gpio-cells = <4>;
gpio-controller;
};
+
+
+Samsung S3C24XX GPIO Controller
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Compatible property value should be "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio".
+
+- reg: Physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
+ region.
+
+- #gpio-cells: Should be 3. The syntax of the gpio specifier used by client nodes
+ should be the following with values derived from the SoC user manual.
+ <[phandle of the gpio controller node]
+ [pin number within the gpio controller]
+ [mux function]
+ [flags and pull up/down]
+
+ Values for gpio specifier:
+ - Pin number: depending on the controller a number from 0 up to 15.
+ - Flags and Pull Up/Down: 0 - Pull Up/Down Disabled.
+ 1 - Pull Down Enabled.
+ 3 - Pull Up Enabled.
+ Bit 16 (0x00010000) - Input is active low.
+
+- gpio-controller: Specifies that the node is a gpio controller.
+- #address-cells: should be 1.
+- #size-cells: should be 1.
+
+Example:
+
+ gpa: gpio-controller@56000000 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
+ reg = <0x56000000 0x10>;
+ #gpio-cells = <3>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ };
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index a150d2e..80a2817 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -938,6 +938,67 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
s3c_gpiolib_track(chip);
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX) && defined(CONFIG_OF)
+static int s3c24xx_gpio_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags)
+{
+ unsigned int pin;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(gc->of_gpio_n_cells < 3))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(gpiospec->args_count < gc->of_gpio_n_cells))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (gpiospec->args[0] > gc->ngpio)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ pin = gc->base + gpiospec->args[0];
+
+ if (s3c_gpio_cfgpin(pin, S3C_GPIO_SFN(gpiospec->args[1])))
+ pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin function\n");
+ if (s3c_gpio_setpull(pin, gpiospec->args[2] & 0xffff))
+ pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin pull up/down\n");
+
+ if (flags)
+ *flags = gpiospec->args[2] >> 16;
+
+ return gpiospec->args[0];
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match[] __initdata = {
+ { .compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio", },
+ {}
+};
+
+static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
+ u64 base, u64 offset)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = &chip->chip;
+ u64 address;
+
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ return;
+
+ address = chip->base ? base + ((u32)chip->base & 0xfff) : base + offset;
+ gc->of_node = of_find_matching_node_by_address(NULL,
+ s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match, address);
+ if (!gc->of_node) {
+ pr_info("gpio: device tree node not found for gpio controller"
+ " with base address %08llx\n", address);
+ return;
+ }
+ gc->of_gpio_n_cells = 3;
+ gc->of_xlate = s3c24xx_gpio_xlate;
+}
+#elif defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)
+static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
+ u64 base, u64 offset)
+{
+ return;
+}
+#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX) && defined(CONFIG_OF) */
+
static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
int nr_chips, void __iomem *base)
{
@@ -962,6 +1023,8 @@ static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
gc->direction_output = samsung_gpiolib_2bit_output;
samsung_gpiolib_add(chip);
+
+ s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(chip, S3C24XX_PA_GPIO, i * 0x10);
}
}
--
1.7.2.3
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-25 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-25 21:53 Heiko Stübner [this message]
2012-08-25 21:53 ` [PATCH] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 4:20 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-08-27 4:20 ` Thomas Abraham
[not found] ` <CAJuYYwQBOP7-D0fepDsCr+43ASKQ3CmMBMH-M79QH7r=xS85Eg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-27 8:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 8:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 8:57 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 8:57 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 9:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 9:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 9:51 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 9:51 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 10:12 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 10:12 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-28 4:44 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-08-28 4:44 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-08-31 22:52 ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-31 22:52 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208252353.59345.heiko@sntech.de \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.