From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
arm-linux <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:12:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208271212.20016.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+E=qVf9+J1rtvr7snhfRgqKHgWZ+g7TfcQuP8qm00+HH86CDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am Montag, 27. August 2012, 11:51:27 schrieb Vasily Khoruzhick:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Hi Vasily,
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow :-) .
> >
> > The compatible property here only sets the mechanism on how to handle the
> > gpios defined in the devicetree - here to use the s3c24xx-style. As you
> > can see in gpio-samsung.c the handling is already unified for all the
> > s3c24xx architectures.
> >
> > The definition of what gpio banks exist is then done in the respective
> > devicetree file for the individual SoC. And of course here one would have
> > individual definitions, depending on the banks present.
> >
> > For reference my quite empty s3c2416.dtsi file currently looks like:
> >
> > /include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
> >
> > / {
> >
> > compatible = "samsung,s3c2416";
> >
> > cpus {
> >
> > cpu@0 {
> >
> > compatible = "arm,arm926ejs";
> >
> > };
> >
> > };
> >
> > gpio-controllers {
> >
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <1>;
> > gpio-controller;
> > ranges;
> >
> > gpa: gpio-controller@56000000 {
> >
> > compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
> > reg = <0x56000000 0x10>;
> > #gpio-cells = <3>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > gpb: gpio-controller@56000010 {
> >
> > compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
> > reg = <0x56000010 0x10>;
> > #gpio-cells = <3>;
> >
> > };
[ ... ]
> > };
> >
> > };
> >
> > Other s3c24xx SoCs would of course need to define their own.
>
> I see. But how does it handle GPA bank (which is output-only, and
> GPACON differs a bit from GP{B-J}CON? And some banks has lower number
> (not 16) of GPIOs, like GPH.
>
> Also, what would be value for S3C_GPIO_END?
The creation of the banks is still done in gpio-samsung.c and the special
handling of bank-a is still sitting in the s3c24xx_gpios[] array there.
In general the gpios are still created completely like before and the
devicetree information is only attached to them so that dt-devices can
reference them.
As you can see in the original patch, after the respective chip got created in
s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips, s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode searches for the
representation of it in the device tree and attaches this to the chip.
So nothing really changed, except that dt-devices can now reference gpios and
if they do s3c24xx_gpio_xlate will get called to configure them with the
target values from the dt.
Currently I'm also only using it in a mixed mode configuration [1],
supplementing a normal machine file with some devices from the devicetree -
especially as I still need to figure out, what to do about the interrupt
controller.
Heiko
[1] https://github.com/mmind/linux-es600/blob/topic/es600-
devel/arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c24xx-sg06.dts
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:12:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208271212.20016.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+E=qVf9+J1rtvr7snhfRgqKHgWZ+g7TfcQuP8qm00+HH86CDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am Montag, 27. August 2012, 11:51:27 schrieb Vasily Khoruzhick:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Hi Vasily,
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow :-) .
> >
> > The compatible property here only sets the mechanism on how to handle the
> > gpios defined in the devicetree - here to use the s3c24xx-style. As you
> > can see in gpio-samsung.c the handling is already unified for all the
> > s3c24xx architectures.
> >
> > The definition of what gpio banks exist is then done in the respective
> > devicetree file for the individual SoC. And of course here one would have
> > individual definitions, depending on the banks present.
> >
> > For reference my quite empty s3c2416.dtsi file currently looks like:
> >
> > /include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
> >
> > / {
> >
> > compatible = "samsung,s3c2416";
> >
> > cpus {
> >
> > cpu at 0 {
> >
> > compatible = "arm,arm926ejs";
> >
> > };
> >
> > };
> >
> > gpio-controllers {
> >
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <1>;
> > gpio-controller;
> > ranges;
> >
> > gpa: gpio-controller at 56000000 {
> >
> > compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
> > reg = <0x56000000 0x10>;
> > #gpio-cells = <3>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > gpb: gpio-controller at 56000010 {
> >
> > compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
> > reg = <0x56000010 0x10>;
> > #gpio-cells = <3>;
> >
> > };
[ ... ]
> > };
> >
> > };
> >
> > Other s3c24xx SoCs would of course need to define their own.
>
> I see. But how does it handle GPA bank (which is output-only, and
> GPACON differs a bit from GP{B-J}CON? And some banks has lower number
> (not 16) of GPIOs, like GPH.
>
> Also, what would be value for S3C_GPIO_END?
The creation of the banks is still done in gpio-samsung.c and the special
handling of bank-a is still sitting in the s3c24xx_gpios[] array there.
In general the gpios are still created completely like before and the
devicetree information is only attached to them so that dt-devices can
reference them.
As you can see in the original patch, after the respective chip got created in
s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips, s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode searches for the
representation of it in the device tree and attaches this to the chip.
So nothing really changed, except that dt-devices can now reference gpios and
if they do s3c24xx_gpio_xlate will get called to configure them with the
target values from the dt.
Currently I'm also only using it in a mixed mode configuration [1],
supplementing a normal machine file with some devices from the devicetree -
especially as I still need to figure out, what to do about the interrupt
controller.
Heiko
[1] https://github.com/mmind/linux-es600/blob/topic/es600-
devel/arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c24xx-sg06.dts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-25 21:53 [PATCH] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches Heiko Stübner
2012-08-25 21:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 4:20 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-08-27 4:20 ` Thomas Abraham
[not found] ` <CAJuYYwQBOP7-D0fepDsCr+43ASKQ3CmMBMH-M79QH7r=xS85Eg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-27 8:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 8:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 8:57 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 8:57 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 9:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 9:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-27 9:51 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 9:51 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-08-27 10:12 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2012-08-27 10:12 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-28 4:44 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-08-28 4:44 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-08-31 22:52 ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-31 22:52 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208271212.20016.heiko@sntech.de \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=anarsoul@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.