All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6 v2] ARM: integrator: check PL010 device name rather than base address
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:32:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209011832.47805.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346471760-23993-2-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>

On Saturday 01 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> In the PL010 UART callback a comparison against the base address is
> done to figure out which UART is doing the callback. This does not
> play well with device tree, so let's check the dev_name() of the
> device instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Hmm, I think the dev_name would also not be that nice, because it changes
after the conversion to DT is complete.

>  arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
> index 5ba4bc8..67ea181 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void integrator_uart_set_mctrl(struct amba_device *dev, void __iomem *bas
>  {
>         unsigned int ctrls = 0, ctrlc = 0, rts_mask, dtr_mask;
>  
> -       if (dev == &uart0_device) {
> +       if (!strcmp(dev_name(&dev->dev), "uart0")) {
>                 rts_mask = 1 << 4;
>                 dtr_mask = 1 << 5;
>         } else {

Maybe it's possible to compare the base pointer against INTEGRATOR_UART0_BASE instead?

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6 v2] ARM: integrator: check PL010 device name rather than base address
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:32:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209011832.47805.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346471760-23993-2-git-send-email-linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On Saturday 01 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> In the PL010 UART callback a comparison against the base address is
> done to figure out which UART is doing the callback. This does not
> play well with device tree, so let's check the dev_name() of the
> device instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Hmm, I think the dev_name would also not be that nice, because it changes
after the conversion to DT is complete.

>  arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
> index 5ba4bc8..67ea181 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void integrator_uart_set_mctrl(struct amba_device *dev, void __iomem *bas
>  {
>         unsigned int ctrls = 0, ctrlc = 0, rts_mask, dtr_mask;
>  
> -       if (dev == &uart0_device) {
> +       if (!strcmp(dev_name(&dev->dev), "uart0")) {
>                 rts_mask = 1 << 4;
>                 dtr_mask = 1 << 5;
>         } else {

Maybe it's possible to compare the base pointer against INTEGRATOR_UART0_BASE instead?

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-01 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-01  3:55 [PATCH 1/6 v2] ARM: integrator: call common init function from machine Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55 ` [PATCH 2/6 v2] ARM: integrator: check PL010 device name rather than base address Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55   ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55   ` [PATCH 3/6 v2] ARM: plat-versatile: add DT support to FPGA IRQ controller Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55     ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55     ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] ARM: integrator: initial device tree support Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55       ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55       ` [PATCH 5/6 v2] ARM: integrator: convert AMBA devices to device tree Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55         ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55         ` [PATCH 6/6 v2] ARM: integrator: convert platform devices to Device Tree Linus Walleij
2012-09-01  3:55           ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 18:41       ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] ARM: integrator: initial device tree support Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-01 18:41         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-03 21:43         ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 21:43           ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 21:55           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-03 21:55             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-04  7:19             ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-04  7:19               ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-05  5:34               ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-05  5:34                 ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-05  5:47                 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-05  5:47                   ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-02 22:59       ` Rob Herring
2012-09-02 22:59         ` Rob Herring
2012-09-03 21:51         ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 21:51           ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 13:20           ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 13:20             ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 13:56             ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 13:56               ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 14:19               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-06 14:19                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-12 16:52                 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-12 16:52                   ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 15:35               ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 15:35                 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 14:14             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-06 14:14               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-01 18:32   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-09-01 18:32     ` [PATCH 2/6 v2] ARM: integrator: check PL010 device name rather than base address Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-03 19:40     ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 19:40       ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 19:51       ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 19:51         ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201209011832.47805.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.