From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6 v2] ARM: integrator: initial device tree support
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:34:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905053402.GI6747@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbXSaBNystUv9RTmDKrmV=OakFF49LPkoQtoi9FnaXmDg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > [Me]
> >> Currently I would make it impossible to use ATAGs if I do this since
> >> the symbol does not exist, so I really need to base such an
> >> approach in a tree which has CONFIG_ATAG in the first place.
> >
> > I've just merged that patch though.
>
> OK great, Arnd do you have a Russell baseline in ARM SoC or is it
> easier if I try to submit this series directly to Russell?
Since Russell said he hasn't applied it to a stable branch we can't pull
anything in yet. But once he does, especially if he does it on a separate topic
branch, we can easily pull that in as a prerequisite in arm-soc. Russell?
There probably isn't much conflicting development in this release cycle
on integrator though, so having all changes go through Russell could be
OK as well. Only time that becomes awkward is if there's changes in both
trees that end up needing manual merge resolution. I don't think that's
high risk in this case.
So, Linus, it's up to you (and Russell) what you prefer, but I'd be
happy to take it through arm-soc if we get a stable base.
-Olof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6 v2] ARM: integrator: initial device tree support
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:34:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905053402.GI6747@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbXSaBNystUv9RTmDKrmV=OakFF49LPkoQtoi9FnaXmDg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > [Me]
> >> Currently I would make it impossible to use ATAGs if I do this since
> >> the symbol does not exist, so I really need to base such an
> >> approach in a tree which has CONFIG_ATAG in the first place.
> >
> > I've just merged that patch though.
>
> OK great, Arnd do you have a Russell baseline in ARM SoC or is it
> easier if I try to submit this series directly to Russell?
Since Russell said he hasn't applied it to a stable branch we can't pull
anything in yet. But once he does, especially if he does it on a separate topic
branch, we can easily pull that in as a prerequisite in arm-soc. Russell?
There probably isn't much conflicting development in this release cycle
on integrator though, so having all changes go through Russell could be
OK as well. Only time that becomes awkward is if there's changes in both
trees that end up needing manual merge resolution. I don't think that's
high risk in this case.
So, Linus, it's up to you (and Russell) what you prefer, but I'd be
happy to take it through arm-soc if we get a stable base.
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-01 3:55 [PATCH 1/6 v2] ARM: integrator: call common init function from machine Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` [PATCH 2/6 v2] ARM: integrator: check PL010 device name rather than base address Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` [PATCH 3/6 v2] ARM: plat-versatile: add DT support to FPGA IRQ controller Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] ARM: integrator: initial device tree support Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` [PATCH 5/6 v2] ARM: integrator: convert AMBA devices to device tree Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` [PATCH 6/6 v2] ARM: integrator: convert platform devices to Device Tree Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 3:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-01 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] ARM: integrator: initial device tree support Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-01 18:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-03 21:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 21:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 21:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-03 21:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-04 7:19 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-04 7:19 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-05 5:34 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2012-09-05 5:34 ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-05 5:47 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-05 5:47 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-02 22:59 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-02 22:59 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-03 21:51 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 21:51 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 13:56 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 13:56 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 14:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-06 14:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-12 16:52 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-12 16:52 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 15:35 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 15:35 ` Rob Herring
2012-09-06 14:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-06 14:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-01 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/6 v2] ARM: integrator: check PL010 device name rather than base address Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-01 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-03 19:40 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 19:40 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 19:51 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 19:51 ` Linus Walleij
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-05 19:28 [PATCH 4/6 v2] ARM: integrator: initial device tree support Linus Walleij
2012-09-05 19:28 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905053402.GI6747@quad.lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.