From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6 v3] ARM: integrator: check PL010 base address from resource
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:10:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209032010.46141.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346702775-19828-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On Monday 03 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> In the PL010 UART callback a comparison against the location of the
> statically allocated PL010 device is done to figure out which UART
> is doing the callback. This does not play well with dynamic devices
> such as in device tree, so let's check the base address of the
> memory resource inside the amba_device instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v2->v3:
> - Check for the base address of the physical memory resource instead
> of checking for the device name (which will also be dynamic when
> we use device tree).
Ok, looks good to me.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6 v3] ARM: integrator: check PL010 base address from resource
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:10:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209032010.46141.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346702775-19828-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Monday 03 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> In the PL010 UART callback a comparison against the location of the
> statically allocated PL010 device is done to figure out which UART
> is doing the callback. This does not play well with dynamic devices
> such as in device tree, so let's check the base address of the
> memory resource inside the amba_device instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v2->v3:
> - Check for the base address of the physical memory resource instead
> of checking for the device name (which will also be dynamic when
> we use device tree).
Ok, looks good to me.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-03 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-03 20:06 [PATCH 2/6 v3] ARM: integrator: check PL010 base address from resource Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 20:06 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-03 20:10 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-09-03 20:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201209032010.46141.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.