From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 03:18:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906031801.GA16913@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346900756.19098.20.camel@pasglop>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:05:56PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:03 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >
> > No problem. Sorry I didn't know that. Will test HEAD commits only for
> > this branch in future.
>
> Actually, I'd rather you continue doing bisection tests, it's good, I
> can whack on the head of people who submit stuff with breakage.
OK.
> In fact, next time around, I'll try to be more pro-active at putting
> things in my rebase-able test branch so you get a chance to run your
> tests on it and we can find & fix these before it hits next. I'll let
> you know when I do it.
That would be great.
> In the meantime, maybe just blacklist those commits ?
Should not necessary if I understand you right. FYI the build system
will auto ignore all notified build errors and skip compiled commits.
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_of_DRAM'
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:18:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906031801.GA16913@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346900756.19098.20.camel@pasglop>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:05:56PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:03 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >
> > No problem. Sorry I didn't know that. Will test HEAD commits only for
> > this branch in future.
>
> Actually, I'd rather you continue doing bisection tests, it's good, I
> can whack on the head of people who submit stuff with breakage.
OK.
> In fact, next time around, I'll try to be more pro-active at putting
> things in my rebase-able test branch so you get a chance to run your
> tests on it and we can find & fix these before it hits next. I'll let
> you know when I do it.
That would be great.
> In the meantime, maybe just blacklist those commits ?
Should not necessary if I understand you right. FYI the build system
will auto ignore all notified build errors and skip compiled commits.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 2:20 [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_of_DRAM' Fengguang Wu
2012-09-06 2:44 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-09-06 2:44 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_of_DRAM' Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-09-06 2:49 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-09-06 2:49 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_of_DRAM' Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-09-06 3:03 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration Fengguang Wu
2012-09-06 3:03 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_of_DRAM' Fengguang Wu
2012-09-06 3:05 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-09-06 3:05 ` [powerpc:next 11/29] arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c:1064:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_of_DRAM' Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-09-06 3:18 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-09-06 3:18 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120906031801.GA16913@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.