From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@ti.com>
Cc: "paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Hunter, Jon" <jon-hunter@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] GPMC driver conversion
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:31:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120911163140.GC23092@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9E1D9B@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
* Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@ti.com> [120911 03:54]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:40:34, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > Great, this all looks good to me. I suggest that on top of this
> > we add minimal devicetree binding that does not even attempt to
> > deal with the timings yet.
> >
> > Then once the minimal devicetree binding is in place, we can
> > call the current GPMC timing functions using the compatible flags
> > and auxdata in the gpmc.c driver.
> >
> > That way we get all the legacy boards booting with GPMC support
> > for smsc911x etc, and can even remove some less used board-*.c
> > files.
>
> Thanks. I agree with your suggestion and would be proceeding so
> as to achieve minimal devicetree support.
>
> And a newer version of this series has been posted.
OK great!
> > Then we just add the generic GPMC timings when we're happy with
> > those.
>
> Meanwhile can you send me the gpmc debug logs for n800 where tusb
> patch on generic timing was causing the hang along with logs
> without the culprit tusb patch so that we could arrive at generic
> gpmc timings.
Yes sorry been meaning to do that but keep getting distracted
continuously somehow..
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/3] GPMC driver conversion
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:31:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120911163140.GC23092@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9E1D9B@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
* Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@ti.com> [120911 03:54]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:40:34, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > Great, this all looks good to me. I suggest that on top of this
> > we add minimal devicetree binding that does not even attempt to
> > deal with the timings yet.
> >
> > Then once the minimal devicetree binding is in place, we can
> > call the current GPMC timing functions using the compatible flags
> > and auxdata in the gpmc.c driver.
> >
> > That way we get all the legacy boards booting with GPMC support
> > for smsc911x etc, and can even remove some less used board-*.c
> > files.
>
> Thanks. I agree with your suggestion and would be proceeding so
> as to achieve minimal devicetree support.
>
> And a newer version of this series has been posted.
OK great!
> > Then we just add the generic GPMC timings when we're happy with
> > those.
>
> Meanwhile can you send me the gpmc debug logs for n800 where tusb
> patch on generic timing was causing the hang along with logs
> without the culprit tusb patch so that we could arrive at generic
> gpmc timings.
Yes sorry been meaning to do that but keep getting distracted
continuously somehow..
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 12:36 [PATCH v8 0/3] GPMC driver conversion Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 12:36 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 12:37 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] ARM: OMAP2/3: hwmod data: add gpmc Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 12:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 19:47 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-05 19:47 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-05 19:47 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-05 19:47 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-05 23:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-09-05 23:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-09-05 12:37 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Adapt to HWMOD Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 12:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 19:55 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-05 19:55 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-11 10:16 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-09-11 10:16 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-09-05 12:37 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: minimal driver support Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 12:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2012-09-05 20:41 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-05 20:41 ` Jon Hunter
2012-09-07 22:10 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] GPMC driver conversion Tony Lindgren
2012-09-07 22:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-09-10 8:30 ` Florian Vaussard
2012-09-10 8:30 ` Florian Vaussard
2012-09-11 10:53 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-09-11 10:53 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-09-11 16:31 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-09-11 16:31 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120911163140.GC23092@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=afzal@ti.com \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.