Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] GPMC driver conversion

[Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>]

Hello,

Le 08/09/2012 00:10, Tony Lindgren a écrit :
> * Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com> [120905 05:37]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Basic gpmc driver conversion series. Driver that is now created out of
>> gpmc code is a simple one, it handles tasks that were earlier executed
>> by gpmc_init. Now instead of relying on cpu_is_* checks, it obtains
>> resources and clk handle in the standard Linux way. The existing gpmc
>> interface works as was without this series.
>>
>> HWMOD patch also has been brought into this series back with v7 series
>>
>> As this creates only a basic driver, further gpmc driver work can be
>> based over this, while having a driver first in place.
>>
>> This series is based on l-o/testing-cleanup as on 5-Sep-12,
>> i.e. over commit,
>>
>> e3a5c14 ARM: OMAP1: Move SoC specific headers from plat to mach for omap1
>>
>> per Tony's suggestion.
>>
>> It is available
>> @git://gitorious.org/x0148406-public/linux-kernel.git gpmc-drv-v8
> Great, this all looks good to me. I suggest that on top of this
> we add minimal devicetree binding that does not even attempt to
> deal with the timings yet.
>
> Then once the minimal devicetree binding is in place, we can
> call the current GPMC timing functions using the compatible flags
> and auxdata in the gpmc.c driver.
>
> That way we get all the legacy boards booting with GPMC support
> for smsc911x etc, and can even remove some less used board-*.c
> files.

This would be great. If you happen to have DT bindings for GPMC,
I would be happy to test them with my Overo board, as well as
with my CAN chips on a custom board.

Regards,
Florian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html