All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:03:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120918190345.GU3274@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120918184201.GD28689@thunk.org>

Hey Ted,

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Your impression is just a few days out of date.  See:
> > 
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html
> 
> On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially
> setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests?

You might even be the first person to suggest that.  ;)

> I'm not
> subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to
> avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox
> (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on
> the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes
> to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc.  I wonder if there are
> other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing
> list who would if there was a separate mailing list.
> 
> Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I
> guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well...

I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list.  But
like you said, xfs@oss.sgi.com isn't extremely high volume.  Maybe a filter for
xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes?

Regards,
	Ben

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:03:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120918190345.GU3274@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120918184201.GD28689@thunk.org>

Hey Ted,

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Your impression is just a few days out of date.  See:
> > 
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html
> 
> On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially
> setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests?

You might even be the first person to suggest that.  ;)

> I'm not
> subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to
> avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox
> (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on
> the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes
> to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc.  I wonder if there are
> other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing
> list who would if there was a separate mailing list.
> 
> Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I
> guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well...

I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list.  But
like you said, xfs@oss.sgi.com isn't extremely high volume.  Maybe a filter for
xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes?

Regards,
	Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-18 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-18  2:04 Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18  2:29 ` Jie Liu
2012-09-18  6:21 ` Marco Stornelli
2012-09-18  6:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-18  6:40   ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-18 14:43   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-09-18 14:43     ` Mark Tinguely
2012-09-18 18:15     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 18:15       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 18:20       ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-18 18:20         ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-18 18:28       ` Ben Myers
2012-09-18 18:28         ` Ben Myers
2012-09-18 18:42         ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 18:42           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 19:03           ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-09-18 19:03             ` Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120918190345.GU3274@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.