All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:20:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5058BB5F.5050506@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120918181556.GC28689@thunk.org>

On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS
>> version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests).
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests
> tree and the one on kernel.org?  Is the OSS tree always ahead of the
> kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of
> the ones in the kernel.org tree)?
> 
> I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the
> kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed
> on that point?

That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to
ditch the kernel.org repos and let sgi manage a single repo on oss.sgi.com
going forward, just to simplify things.

We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet
I guess.

So going forward, stick with the one on oss.sgi.com.

Thanks,
-Eric

> Thanks,
> 
> 						- Ted
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:20:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5058BB5F.5050506@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120918181556.GC28689@thunk.org>

On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS
>> version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests).
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests
> tree and the one on kernel.org?  Is the OSS tree always ahead of the
> kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of
> the ones in the kernel.org tree)?
> 
> I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the
> kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed
> on that point?

That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to
ditch the kernel.org repos and let sgi manage a single repo on oss.sgi.com
going forward, just to simplify things.

We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet
I guess.

So going forward, stick with the one on oss.sgi.com.

Thanks,
-Eric

> Thanks,
> 
> 						- Ted
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-18 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-18  2:04 Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18  2:29 ` Jie Liu
2012-09-18  6:21 ` Marco Stornelli
2012-09-18  6:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-18  6:40   ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-18 14:43   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-09-18 14:43     ` Mark Tinguely
2012-09-18 18:15     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 18:15       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 18:20       ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-09-18 18:20         ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-18 18:28       ` Ben Myers
2012-09-18 18:28         ` Ben Myers
2012-09-18 18:42         ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 18:42           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 19:03           ` Ben Myers
2012-09-18 19:03             ` Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5058BB5F.5050506@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.