From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM: use C pre-processor with dtc
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:05:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925200528.GK4428@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348603151.5565.20@snotra>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:59:11PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 02:51:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >The constant example is the magic numbers we need to embed into
> >DTs for
> >things like interrupt modes, making them human readable would be a
> >real
> >win.
> Wasn't there a patch for named constant support in dtc a while back?
> Hmm: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-January/011184.html
> I'm not sure that going down the CPP path is better than the
> possibility of named constants having a different syntax from
> macros/functions. It would be one thing if someone were actively
> working on the latter, but this paralysis seems to be a case of the
> perfect being the enemy of the good.
I don't know, it doesn't appear to have been integrated (and we still
need to be able to or things together).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM: use C pre-processor with dtc
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:05:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925200528.GK4428@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348603151.5565.20@snotra>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:59:11PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 02:51:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >The constant example is the magic numbers we need to embed into
> >DTs for
> >things like interrupt modes, making them human readable would be a
> >real
> >win.
> Wasn't there a patch for named constant support in dtc a while back?
> Hmm: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-January/011184.html
> I'm not sure that going down the CPP path is better than the
> possibility of named constants having a different syntax from
> macros/functions. It would be one thing if someone were actively
> working on the latter, but this paralysis seems to be a case of the
> perfect being the enemy of the good.
I don't know, it doesn't appear to have been integrated (and we still
need to be able to or things together).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 19:06 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM: use C pre-processor with dtc Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] kbuild: introduce cmd_dtc_cpp Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-27 5:44 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 5:44 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 15:39 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-27 15:39 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-27 17:40 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 17:40 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-25 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM: use cmd_dtc_cpp for compilation of *.dts-cpp to *.dtb Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-27 5:47 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 5:47 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 15:40 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-27 15:40 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ARM: tegra: compile all DT files with cpp Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM: use C pre-processor with dtc Scott Wood
2012-09-25 19:35 ` Scott Wood
2012-09-25 19:51 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-25 19:51 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-25 19:59 ` Scott Wood
2012-09-25 19:59 ` Scott Wood
2012-09-25 20:05 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 20:05 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 20:05 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-09-25 20:05 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-25 19:51 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 19:51 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-25 23:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-09-25 23:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-09-27 5:40 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 5:40 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 15:38 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-27 15:38 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-27 17:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-27 17:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120925200528.GK4428@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.