From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] ZPODD patches
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:43:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120927094351.GA21156@mint-spring.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348570949.2457.36.camel@dabdike>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:02:29PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:18 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > A example patch would be something like the following, I didn't seperate
> > these ACPI calls in sr.c as this is just a concept proof, if this is the
> > right thing to do, I will separate them into another file sr-acpi.c and
> > make empty stubs for them in sr.h for systems do not have ACPI configured.
>
> Apart from the needed separation to compile in the !ACPI case
>
> > +static void sr_acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
> > + acpi_handle handle;
> > + acpi_status status;
> > +
> > + handle = dev->archdata.acpi_handle;
>
> This is a complete no-no. archdata is defined to be specific to the
> architecture it's supposed to be opaque to non-arch code. You'll find
> that only x86 and ia64 defines an acpi_handle there. This will
> instantly fail to compile on non intel. If you need the handle, it
> should be obtained via some accessor like dev_to_acpi_handle() which
> will allow this to continue to function when, say, arm acquires ACPI.
>
> I've got to say, this looks like a fault in ACPI itself. If the handles
> are 1:1 with struct device, then why not have all the functions taking
> handles take the device instead and leave the embedded handle safely in
> the architecture specific code?
I've prepared a complete code change for you to take a look, with the
notification code resides in sr, I can move the need_eject flag from
scsi_device to scsi_cd, which should make more sense.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Makefile b/drivers/scsi/Makefile
index 888f73a..9f0a1da 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Makefile
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ sd_mod-objs := sd.o
sd_mod-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY) += sd_dif.o
sr_mod-objs := sr.o sr_ioctl.o sr_vendor.o
+sr_mod-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += sr_acpi.o
ncr53c8xx-flags-$(CONFIG_SCSI_ZALON) \
:= -DCONFIG_NCR53C8XX_PREFETCH -DSCSI_NCR_BIG_ENDIAN \
-DCONFIG_SCSI_NCR53C8XX_NO_WORD_TRANSFERS
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr.c b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
index 4d1a610..cb6703c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
@@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ static int sr_probe(struct device *dev)
sdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, sdev,
"Attached scsi CD-ROM %s\n", cd->cdi.name);
+ sr_acpi_add_pm_notifier(dev);
scsi_autopm_put_device(cd->device);
return 0;
@@ -984,6 +985,7 @@ static int sr_remove(struct device *dev)
struct scsi_cd *cd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
scsi_autopm_get_device(cd->device);
+ sr_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(dev);
blk_queue_prep_rq(cd->device->request_queue, scsi_prep_fn);
del_gendisk(cd->disk);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr.h b/drivers/scsi/sr.h
index 37c8f6b..1f66fa0a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sr.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sr.h
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ typedef struct scsi_cd {
bool get_event_changed:1; /* changed according to GET_EVENT */
bool ignore_get_event:1; /* GET_EVENT is unreliable, use TUR */
+ bool need_eject:1; /* User wakes up the ODD, need eject the tray */
+
struct cdrom_device_info cdi;
/* We hold gendisk and scsi_device references on probe and use
* the refs on this kref to decide when to release them */
@@ -74,4 +76,13 @@ void sr_vendor_init(Scsi_CD *);
int sr_cd_check(struct cdrom_device_info *);
int sr_set_blocklength(Scsi_CD *, int blocklength);
+/* sr_acpi.c */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+extern void sr_acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct device *);
+extern void sr_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct device *);
+#else
+static inline void sr_acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct device *dev) {}
+static inline void sr_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct device *dev) {}
+#endif
+
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr_acpi.c b/drivers/scsi/sr_acpi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ce6bc11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sr_acpi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+#include <linux/cdrom.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <scsi/scsi_device.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
+#include "sr.h"
+
+static void sr_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
+{
+ struct device *dev = context;
+ struct scsi_cd *cd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE && pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
+ cd->need_eject = 1;
+ pm_runtime_resume(dev);
+ }
+}
+
+void sr_acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
+ acpi_handle handle;
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
+
+ if (!sdev->can_power_off)
+ return;
+
+ handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
+ if (!handle)
+ return;
+
+ status = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return;
+
+ acpi_power_resource_register_device(dev, handle);
+ acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
+ sr_acpi_wake_dev, dev);
+ device_set_run_wake(dev, true);
+}
+
+void sr_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
+ acpi_handle handle;
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
+
+ if (!sdev->can_power_off)
+ return;
+
+ handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
+ if (!handle)
+ return;
+
+ status = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return;
+
+ acpi_power_resource_unregister_device(dev, handle);
+ device_set_run_wake(dev, false);
+ acpi_remove_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY, sr_acpi_wake_dev);
+}
Thanks,
Aaron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-27 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 8:29 [PATCH v7 0/6] ZPODD patches Aaron Lu
2012-09-12 8:29 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] block: genhd: add an interface to set disk poll interval Aaron Lu
2012-09-20 20:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-12 8:29 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] scsi: sr: support runtime pm Aaron Lu
2012-09-20 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-20 20:54 ` Alan Stern
2012-09-21 1:02 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-21 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-24 1:20 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-24 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-24 14:52 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-24 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-25 8:01 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-25 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-25 14:20 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-25 14:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-25 14:46 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-25 21:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-26 1:03 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-26 11:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-26 14:52 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-26 7:20 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-27 10:46 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-28 8:20 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-12 8:29 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] scsi: sr: support zero power ODD(ZPODD) Aaron Lu
2012-09-20 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-21 1:39 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-21 21:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-27 9:26 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-27 14:42 ` Alan Stern
2012-09-27 14:55 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-27 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-24 21:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-09-12 8:29 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] scsi: pm: add may_power_off flag Aaron Lu
2012-09-12 8:29 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] scsi: sr: use may_power_off Aaron Lu
2012-09-12 8:29 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] libata: acpi: respect may_power_off flag Aaron Lu
2012-09-24 21:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-09-19 8:03 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] ZPODD patches Aaron Lu
2012-09-19 12:27 ` James Bottomley
2012-09-19 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-19 14:19 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-20 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-21 5:48 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-21 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-22 7:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-22 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-22 15:38 ` Alan Stern
2012-09-22 19:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-22 20:23 ` Alan Stern
2012-09-22 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-24 2:55 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-24 13:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-24 15:04 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-24 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-25 8:18 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-25 11:02 ` James Bottomley
2012-09-25 13:56 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-27 9:43 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2012-09-24 15:47 ` Alan Stern
2012-09-19 14:52 ` James Bottomley
2012-09-20 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-19 13:05 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-19 15:19 ` David Woodhouse
2012-09-20 0:34 ` Jack Wang
[not found] ` <201209280115.06964.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <5064FA08.6030005@intel.com>
[not found] ` <201209282346.15872.rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-09-29 2:10 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] scsi: sr: support runtime pm Aaron Lu
2012-09-29 14:29 ` Alan Stern
2012-09-29 15:03 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-29 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-30 12:32 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-30 14:47 ` Alan Stern
2012-09-30 15:39 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-30 19:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-09-30 19:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-09-29 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-30 19:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-09-30 19:43 ` Alan Stern
2012-10-01 4:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-10-08 9:27 ` Aaron Lu
2012-10-08 10:21 ` James Bottomley
2012-10-09 7:20 ` Aaron Lu
2012-10-09 14:58 ` James Bottomley
2012-10-11 7:49 ` Aaron Lu
2012-10-09 23:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-29 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-30 12:38 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120927094351.GA21156@mint-spring.sh.intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.