All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:09:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210241209.58655.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024003218.GA31625@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com>

On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Things have been relatively quiet on the Zynq front lately.  This patchset does
> a bit of cleanup of the Zynq subarchitecture.  It was the necessary set of
> things I had to do to get a zynq target booting with the upstream qemu model.
> 
> Patches 1 and 2 move zynq to use the GIC and pl310 L2 cache controller device
> tree mappings respectively.
> 
> Patch 3 removes unused clock infrastructure.  the plan is to rework the
> out-of-tree Xilinx generic clk support into something suitable for merging.
> What's in tree now just isn't used at all, and can be removed.
> 
> Patch 4 and 5 move around the static peripheral mappings into the vmalloc area.

Looks all good to me now.

> 
> I intentionally did not Cc stable on patch 5, even though you had
> suggested otherwise.  I do not think it will apply cleanly to the stable
> trees independent of the other patches.  Additionally, with the current
> state of zynq upstream, I'm not convinced there would be enough users to
> make it worth the effort.

Ok, fair enough.

> Additionally, I've left the SCU static mapping around, even though its
> currently unused.  We'll eventually need it around (maybe in a different form)
> when SMP support is added.

Right.

John, are you going to pick up these patches and send a pull request?

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@ni.com>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	John Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:09:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210241209.58655.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024003218.GA31625@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com>

On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Things have been relatively quiet on the Zynq front lately.  This patchset does
> a bit of cleanup of the Zynq subarchitecture.  It was the necessary set of
> things I had to do to get a zynq target booting with the upstream qemu model.
> 
> Patches 1 and 2 move zynq to use the GIC and pl310 L2 cache controller device
> tree mappings respectively.
> 
> Patch 3 removes unused clock infrastructure.  the plan is to rework the
> out-of-tree Xilinx generic clk support into something suitable for merging.
> What's in tree now just isn't used at all, and can be removed.
> 
> Patch 4 and 5 move around the static peripheral mappings into the vmalloc area.

Looks all good to me now.

> 
> I intentionally did not Cc stable on patch 5, even though you had
> suggested otherwise.  I do not think it will apply cleanly to the stable
> trees independent of the other patches.  Additionally, with the current
> state of zynq upstream, I'm not convinced there would be enough users to
> make it worth the effort.

Ok, fair enough.

> Additionally, I've left the SCU static mapping around, even though its
> currently unused.  We'll eventually need it around (maybe in a different form)
> when SMP support is added.

Right.

John, are you going to pick up these patches and send a pull request?

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24  0:32 [PATCH v3 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:32 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:33   ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24 12:03   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 12:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] zynq: use pl310 " Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:34   ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24 12:04   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 12:04     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24  0:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] zynq: remove use of CLKDEV_LOOKUP Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:34   ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24 12:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 12:05     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 13:32   ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-24 13:32     ` Nick Bowler
2012-10-24 18:16     ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24 18:16       ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:35   ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24 12:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 12:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24  0:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] zynq: move static peripheral mappings Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24  0:35   ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-24 12:08   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 12:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-24 12:09 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-10-24 12:09   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201210241209.58655.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.