From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm: mvebu: increase atomic coherent pool size for armada 370/XP
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:46:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210251346.41596.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121025134352.16a8ef81@skate>
On Thursday 25 October 2012, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:36 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > > For Armada 370/XP we have the same problem that for the commit
> > > cb01b63, so we applied the same solution: "The default 256 KiB
> > > coherent pool may be too small for some of the Kirkwood devices, so
> > > increase it to make sure that devices will be able to allocate their
> > > buffers with GFP_ATOMIC flag"
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > Do you know why the ATA driver needs this? I find it surprising that
> > it's necessary, so I'd like to make sure we're not just working around
> > a device driver bug here.
>
> The sata_mv driver create dma_pool and allocate objects from them, and
> all the memory allocated for dma_pools is allocated using
> dma_alloc_coherent(), and I guess the driver is using too much of them.
>
> Seems like the driver is too lazy and allocates everything coherent to
> avoid the hassle of doing dma_map/dma_unmap operations when needed, but
> I haven't looked in details at the driver yet to see if it would be
> possible to switch those DMA coherent allocations into non-coherent
> allocations + appropriate calls to the DMA operations.
Using coherent allocations is fine, I was wondering whether they need
to be atomic or not.
> That said, that's for sure a larger task than just enabling SATA on
> Armada 370/XP, so I would advocate to handle this problem separately.
Agreed.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Ian Molton <ian.molton@codethink.co.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@marvell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@marvell.com>,
"Eran Ben-Avi" <benavi@marvell.com>,
Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
Ike Pan <ike.pan@canonical.com>,
Jani Monoses <jani.monoses@canonical.com>,
Chris Van Hoof <vanhoof@canonical.com>,
Dan Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, David Marlin <dmarlin@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: mvebu: increase atomic coherent pool size for armada 370/XP
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:46:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210251346.41596.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121025134352.16a8ef81@skate>
On Thursday 25 October 2012, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:36 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > > For Armada 370/XP we have the same problem that for the commit
> > > cb01b63, so we applied the same solution: "The default 256 KiB
> > > coherent pool may be too small for some of the Kirkwood devices, so
> > > increase it to make sure that devices will be able to allocate their
> > > buffers with GFP_ATOMIC flag"
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > Do you know why the ATA driver needs this? I find it surprising that
> > it's necessary, so I'd like to make sure we're not just working around
> > a device driver bug here.
>
> The sata_mv driver create dma_pool and allocate objects from them, and
> all the memory allocated for dma_pools is allocated using
> dma_alloc_coherent(), and I guess the driver is using too much of them.
>
> Seems like the driver is too lazy and allocates everything coherent to
> avoid the hassle of doing dma_map/dma_unmap operations when needed, but
> I haven't looked in details at the driver yet to see if it would be
> possible to switch those DMA coherent allocations into non-coherent
> allocations + appropriate calls to the DMA operations.
Using coherent allocations is fine, I was wondering whether they need
to be atomic or not.
> That said, that's for sure a larger task than just enabling SATA on
> Armada 370/XP, so I would advocate to handle this problem separately.
Agreed.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-24 13:49 [PATCH 0/2] Adding SATA support for Armada 370/XP Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 13:49 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: mvebu: increase atomic coherent pool size for armada 370/XP Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 13:49 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 5:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-10-25 5:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-10-25 11:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-25 11:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-25 11:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-25 11:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-25 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-10-25 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-25 14:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-25 14:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-30 7:19 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-10-24 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: mvebu: adding SATA support: dt binding and config update Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 13:49 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 14:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24 14:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24 14:05 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 14:05 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 13:18 ` Jason Cooper
2012-10-25 13:18 ` Jason Cooper
2012-10-25 13:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-25 13:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-25 13:34 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 13:34 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 13:57 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-25 13:57 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-25 16:00 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 16:00 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 13:35 ` Jason Cooper
2012-10-25 13:35 ` Jason Cooper
2012-10-25 13:53 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-25 13:53 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-25 14:11 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 14:11 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-25 14:27 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-25 14:27 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-24 14:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-10-24 14:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-10-24 14:45 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-24 14:45 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201210251346.41596.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.