From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3TB drives failure rate
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:18:51 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121029031851.42a5e1e9@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6FAB7F92-66E2-4276-9774-B80DAC92E450@colorremedies.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2207 bytes --]
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:07:53 -0600
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
> > For any serious use I just wouldn't use the Greens, without very non-consumer like scrubs, extended smart tests, and cycling out drives so they could be ATA Enhance Secure Erase nuked say once a year or maybe more often. And a rigorous backup. With that kind of expertise and dedication should come a better budget for a better drive.
>
> On 2nd thought, I'd consider the greens something like a "hostile witness" in legal jargon. Relegate them to only ZFS or btrfs (or ReFS maybe, unclear) for "raid" like pooling or redundancy. The drives themselves are inherently suspect so a suspicious grand inquisitor of a file system seems like an appropriate match, to constantly 2nd guess them.
Now you are moving into unfounded superstitions territory.
You seem to imply that a Green drive would return just plain bad data in some
failure condition (else why all the checksumming FSes?), and not an IO Error.
I don't think anything of this sort has been demonstrated so far, and while
this could happen due to bad RAM/chipset/controller/bus/cache/etc, this would
have nothing to do specifically with "Greenness" of a drive, nor any
particular model would be inherently more prone to that.
> But still, once a drive is asked to retrieve an LBA, so long as the drive eventually reports it back correctly, the file system won't correct that sector merely for a delay, even if it is up to 2 minutes or whatever it is. So, filesystem choice doesn't really solve the delay problem. You just have to obliterate the disk periodically with zeros or secure erase.
I do not think there is a state in modern HDDs that there would be a sector
which consistently takes 30-120 seconds to read. Those are either unreadable at
all, or readable after a delay -- and then already remapped by the HDD into the
reserved zone, so the delay is not there the next time.
--
With respect,
Roman
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Stallman had a printer,
with code he could not see.
So he began to tinker,
and set the software free."
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 12:15 3TB drives failure rate Rainer Fügenstein
2012-10-28 12:19 ` Mathias Burén
2012-10-28 12:49 ` John Robinson
2012-10-28 12:54 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-10-28 16:47 ` Ed W
2012-10-28 17:05 ` Joe Landman
2012-10-28 22:12 ` joystick
2012-10-28 22:24 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 23:59 ` joystick
2012-10-29 0:09 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-29 4:29 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-29 7:54 ` David Brown
2012-10-29 13:02 ` Phil Turmel
2012-10-30 23:54 ` 3TB drives failure rate (summary) Rainer Fügenstein
2012-10-31 12:35 ` Phil Turmel
2012-11-01 15:13 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-11-01 15:24 ` John Robinson
2012-11-01 15:39 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-11-01 16:05 ` John Robinson
2012-11-01 16:25 ` Miles Fidelman
2013-02-05 17:43 ` Adam Goryachev
2013-02-05 18:08 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-02-05 20:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-10-29 13:26 ` 3TB drives failure rate Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 19:50 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 19:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-28 20:10 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 20:16 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-28 20:34 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 20:49 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-28 20:59 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:07 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 20:50 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:07 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:18 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2012-10-28 21:24 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2012-10-28 21:45 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 22:35 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:51 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:59 ` joystick
2012-10-28 22:10 ` Phil Turmel
2012-10-29 0:12 ` joystick
2012-10-29 0:21 ` Phil Turmel
2012-10-29 0:27 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:21 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2012-10-28 23:51 ` Peter Kieser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121029031851.42a5e1e9@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.ru \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.