From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Prevent redefinition errors for soc.h
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:50:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121109235006.GB6801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509D94F7.8010707@ti.com>
* Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121109 15:44]:
>
> On 11/09/2012 03:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121109 08:31]:
> >>
> >> On 11/09/2012 10:22 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>> * Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121109 08:21]:
> >>>> If the header soc.h is included more than once in a source (for example
> >>>> once directly by the source file and once indirectly by another header
> >>>> file), then the compiler will generate redefintion errors for the macros
> >>>> in soc.h. Prevent this by only allowing the content in soc.h to be
> >>>> included once.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Please note that I ran into this problem when rebasing my dmtimer fixes
> >>>> series [1] on Tony's Linux-OMAP master branch. I am including plat/cpu.h
> >>>> in dmtimer.h and I found several other files including dmtimer.h are also
> >>>> including soc.h and so generate a lot of errors.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135231490218361&w=2
> >>>
> >>> As these headers are private to mach-omap2, I'd rather not allow including
> >>> them more than once so we can eventually clean up the includes further.
> >>>
> >>> We should include the headers directly where used, except for the
> >>> legacy board-*.c files that will be going away anyways.
> >>>
> >>> Including the files directly should fix this easily, if not let me
> >>> know.
> >>
> >> The alternative fix is to ensure anyone including dmtimer.h also
> >> includes soc.h. However, I did not know if we should have such a
> >> dependency. If you are ok with that then that is what I will do for now.
> >> It is not a massive change.
> >
> > Do you mean anything under mach-omap2/*.c including dmtimer.h also
> > needs to also include soc.h? If sounds OK to me as long as we don't
> > need to include soc.h outside mach-omap2.
>
> Yes exactly. Right now dmtimer.h is including plat/cpu.h and so is
> indirectly including soc.h. The function omap_dm_timer_populate_errata()
> is using the cpu_is_xxxx macros. So maybe I should move this to into
> platform data. Is that better?
I think I already fixed that up in the cleanup branch. I've now
merged that into the omap-for-v3.8/dt branch. The only remaining
cpu_is_omap usage there is:
$ grep cpu_is_omap arch/arm/plat-omap/*.[chS]
arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c: if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c: } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
So maybe see what needs to be patches on top of omap-for-v3.8/dt?
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Prevent redefinition errors for soc.h
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:50:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121109235006.GB6801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509D94F7.8010707@ti.com>
* Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121109 15:44]:
>
> On 11/09/2012 03:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121109 08:31]:
> >>
> >> On 11/09/2012 10:22 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>> * Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121109 08:21]:
> >>>> If the header soc.h is included more than once in a source (for example
> >>>> once directly by the source file and once indirectly by another header
> >>>> file), then the compiler will generate redefintion errors for the macros
> >>>> in soc.h. Prevent this by only allowing the content in soc.h to be
> >>>> included once.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Please note that I ran into this problem when rebasing my dmtimer fixes
> >>>> series [1] on Tony's Linux-OMAP master branch. I am including plat/cpu.h
> >>>> in dmtimer.h and I found several other files including dmtimer.h are also
> >>>> including soc.h and so generate a lot of errors.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135231490218361&w=2
> >>>
> >>> As these headers are private to mach-omap2, I'd rather not allow including
> >>> them more than once so we can eventually clean up the includes further.
> >>>
> >>> We should include the headers directly where used, except for the
> >>> legacy board-*.c files that will be going away anyways.
> >>>
> >>> Including the files directly should fix this easily, if not let me
> >>> know.
> >>
> >> The alternative fix is to ensure anyone including dmtimer.h also
> >> includes soc.h. However, I did not know if we should have such a
> >> dependency. If you are ok with that then that is what I will do for now.
> >> It is not a massive change.
> >
> > Do you mean anything under mach-omap2/*.c including dmtimer.h also
> > needs to also include soc.h? If sounds OK to me as long as we don't
> > need to include soc.h outside mach-omap2.
>
> Yes exactly. Right now dmtimer.h is including plat/cpu.h and so is
> indirectly including soc.h. The function omap_dm_timer_populate_errata()
> is using the cpu_is_xxxx macros. So maybe I should move this to into
> platform data. Is that better?
I think I already fixed that up in the cleanup branch. I've now
merged that into the omap-for-v3.8/dt branch. The only remaining
cpu_is_omap usage there is:
$ grep cpu_is_omap arch/arm/plat-omap/*.[chS]
arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c: if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c: } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
So maybe see what needs to be patches on top of omap-for-v3.8/dt?
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-09 16:19 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Prevent redefinition errors for soc.h Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 16:19 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 16:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-09 16:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-09 16:29 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 16:29 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 21:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-09 21:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-09 23:42 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 23:42 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 23:50 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-11-09 23:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-09 23:57 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 23:57 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-10 0:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-10 0:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-10 2:52 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-10 2:52 ` Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121109235006.GB6801@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.