All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] mm: numa: pte_numa() and pmd_numa()
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:54:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121113095417.GB21522@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352193295-26815-6-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>


* Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:

> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> 
> Implement pte_numa and pmd_numa.
> 
> We must atomically set the numa bit and clear the present bit to
> define a pte_numa or pmd_numa.
> 
> Once a pte or pmd has been set as pte_numa or pmd_numa, the next time
> a thread touches a virtual address in the corresponding virtual range,
> a NUMA hinting page fault will trigger. The NUMA hinting page fault
> will clear the NUMA bit and set the present bit again to resolve the
> page fault.
> 
> The expectation is that a NUMA hinting page fault is used as part
> of a placement policy that decides if a page should remain on the
> current node or migrated to a different node.
> 
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/asm-generic/pgtable.h  |   12 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index a1f780d..e075d57 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -404,7 +404,8 @@ static inline int pte_same(pte_t a, pte_t b)
>  
>  static inline int pte_present(pte_t a)
>  {
> -	return pte_flags(a) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE);
> +	return pte_flags(a) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE |
> +			       _PAGE_NUMA);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int pte_hidden(pte_t pte)
> @@ -420,7 +421,63 @@ static inline int pmd_present(pmd_t pmd)
>  	 * the _PAGE_PSE flag will remain set at all times while the
>  	 * _PAGE_PRESENT bit is clear).
>  	 */
> -	return pmd_flags(pmd) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE | _PAGE_PSE);
> +	return pmd_flags(pmd) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE | _PAGE_PSE |
> +				 _PAGE_NUMA);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA
> +/*
> + * _PAGE_NUMA works identical to _PAGE_PROTNONE (it's actually the
> + * same bit too). It's set only when _PAGE_PRESET is not set and it's
> + * never set if _PAGE_PRESENT is set.
> + *
> + * pte/pmd_present() returns true if pte/pmd_numa returns true. Page
> + * fault triggers on those regions if pte/pmd_numa returns true
> + * (because _PAGE_PRESENT is not set).
> + */
> +static inline int pte_numa(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	return (pte_flags(pte) &
> +		(_PAGE_NUMA|_PAGE_PRESENT)) == _PAGE_NUMA;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pmd_numa(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	return (pmd_flags(pmd) &
> +		(_PAGE_NUMA|_PAGE_PRESENT)) == _PAGE_NUMA;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * pte/pmd_mknuma sets the _PAGE_ACCESSED bitflag automatically
> + * because they're called by the NUMA hinting minor page fault. If we
> + * wouldn't set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bitflag here, the TLB miss handler
> + * would be forced to set it later while filling the TLB after we
> + * return to userland. That would trigger a second write to memory
> + * that we optimize away by setting _PAGE_ACCESSED here.
> + */
> +static inline pte_t pte_mknonnuma(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	pte = pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_ACCESSED);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pmd_t pmd_mknonnuma(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	pmd = pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pmd_set_flags(pmd, _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_ACCESSED);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pte_t pte_mknuma(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	pte = pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_PRESENT);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pmd_t pmd_mknuma(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	pmd = pmd_set_flags(pmd, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_PRESENT);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int pmd_none(pmd_t pmd)
> @@ -479,6 +536,10 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_offset_kernel(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long address)
>  
>  static inline int pmd_bad(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA
> +	if (pmd_numa(pmd))
> +		return 0;
> +#endif
>  	return (pmd_flags(pmd) & ~_PAGE_USER) != _KERNPG_TABLE;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> index b36ce40..896667e 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -554,6 +554,18 @@ static inline int pmd_trans_unstable(pmd_t *pmd)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA
> +static inline int pte_numa(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pmd_numa(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA */
> +

Hm, this overcomplicates things quite a bit and adds arch 
specific code, and there's no explanation given for that 
approach that I can see?

Basically, what's wrong with the generic approach that numa/core 
has:

 __weak bool pte_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t pte)

[see the full function below.]

Then we can reuse existing protection-changing functionality and 
keep it all tidy.

an architecture that wants to do something special could 
possibly override it in the future - but we want to keep the 
generic logic in generic code.

Thanks,

	Ingo

------------>
__weak bool pte_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t pte)
{
	/*
	 * For NUMA page faults, we use PROT_NONE ptes in VMAs with
	 * "normal" vma->vm_page_prot protections.  Genuine PROT_NONE
	 * VMAs should never get here, because the fault handling code
	 * will notice that the VMA has no read or write permissions.
	 *
	 * This means we cannot get 'special' PROT_NONE faults from genuine
	 * PROT_NONE maps, nor from PROT_WRITE file maps that do dirty
	 * tracking.
	 *
	 * Neither case is really interesting for our current use though so we
	 * don't care.
	 */
	if (pte_same(pte, pte_modify(pte, vma->vm_page_prot)))
		return false;

	return pte_same(pte, pte_modify(pte, vma_prot_none(vma)));
}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] mm: numa: pte_numa() and pmd_numa()
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:54:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121113095417.GB21522@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352193295-26815-6-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>


* Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:

> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> 
> Implement pte_numa and pmd_numa.
> 
> We must atomically set the numa bit and clear the present bit to
> define a pte_numa or pmd_numa.
> 
> Once a pte or pmd has been set as pte_numa or pmd_numa, the next time
> a thread touches a virtual address in the corresponding virtual range,
> a NUMA hinting page fault will trigger. The NUMA hinting page fault
> will clear the NUMA bit and set the present bit again to resolve the
> page fault.
> 
> The expectation is that a NUMA hinting page fault is used as part
> of a placement policy that decides if a page should remain on the
> current node or migrated to a different node.
> 
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/asm-generic/pgtable.h  |   12 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index a1f780d..e075d57 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -404,7 +404,8 @@ static inline int pte_same(pte_t a, pte_t b)
>  
>  static inline int pte_present(pte_t a)
>  {
> -	return pte_flags(a) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE);
> +	return pte_flags(a) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE |
> +			       _PAGE_NUMA);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int pte_hidden(pte_t pte)
> @@ -420,7 +421,63 @@ static inline int pmd_present(pmd_t pmd)
>  	 * the _PAGE_PSE flag will remain set at all times while the
>  	 * _PAGE_PRESENT bit is clear).
>  	 */
> -	return pmd_flags(pmd) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE | _PAGE_PSE);
> +	return pmd_flags(pmd) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE | _PAGE_PSE |
> +				 _PAGE_NUMA);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA
> +/*
> + * _PAGE_NUMA works identical to _PAGE_PROTNONE (it's actually the
> + * same bit too). It's set only when _PAGE_PRESET is not set and it's
> + * never set if _PAGE_PRESENT is set.
> + *
> + * pte/pmd_present() returns true if pte/pmd_numa returns true. Page
> + * fault triggers on those regions if pte/pmd_numa returns true
> + * (because _PAGE_PRESENT is not set).
> + */
> +static inline int pte_numa(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	return (pte_flags(pte) &
> +		(_PAGE_NUMA|_PAGE_PRESENT)) == _PAGE_NUMA;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pmd_numa(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	return (pmd_flags(pmd) &
> +		(_PAGE_NUMA|_PAGE_PRESENT)) == _PAGE_NUMA;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * pte/pmd_mknuma sets the _PAGE_ACCESSED bitflag automatically
> + * because they're called by the NUMA hinting minor page fault. If we
> + * wouldn't set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bitflag here, the TLB miss handler
> + * would be forced to set it later while filling the TLB after we
> + * return to userland. That would trigger a second write to memory
> + * that we optimize away by setting _PAGE_ACCESSED here.
> + */
> +static inline pte_t pte_mknonnuma(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	pte = pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_ACCESSED);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pmd_t pmd_mknonnuma(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	pmd = pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pmd_set_flags(pmd, _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_ACCESSED);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pte_t pte_mknuma(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	pte = pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_PRESENT);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pmd_t pmd_mknuma(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	pmd = pmd_set_flags(pmd, _PAGE_NUMA);
> +	return pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_PRESENT);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int pmd_none(pmd_t pmd)
> @@ -479,6 +536,10 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_offset_kernel(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long address)
>  
>  static inline int pmd_bad(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA
> +	if (pmd_numa(pmd))
> +		return 0;
> +#endif
>  	return (pmd_flags(pmd) & ~_PAGE_USER) != _KERNPG_TABLE;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> index b36ce40..896667e 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -554,6 +554,18 @@ static inline int pmd_trans_unstable(pmd_t *pmd)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA
> +static inline int pte_numa(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pmd_numa(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA */
> +

Hm, this overcomplicates things quite a bit and adds arch 
specific code, and there's no explanation given for that 
approach that I can see?

Basically, what's wrong with the generic approach that numa/core 
has:

 __weak bool pte_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t pte)

[see the full function below.]

Then we can reuse existing protection-changing functionality and 
keep it all tidy.

an architecture that wants to do something special could 
possibly override it in the future - but we want to keep the 
generic logic in generic code.

Thanks,

	Ingo

------------>
__weak bool pte_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t pte)
{
	/*
	 * For NUMA page faults, we use PROT_NONE ptes in VMAs with
	 * "normal" vma->vm_page_prot protections.  Genuine PROT_NONE
	 * VMAs should never get here, because the fault handling code
	 * will notice that the VMA has no read or write permissions.
	 *
	 * This means we cannot get 'special' PROT_NONE faults from genuine
	 * PROT_NONE maps, nor from PROT_WRITE file maps that do dirty
	 * tracking.
	 *
	 * Neither case is really interesting for our current use though so we
	 * don't care.
	 */
	if (pte_same(pte, pte_modify(pte, vma->vm_page_prot)))
		return false;

	return pte_same(pte, pte_modify(pte, vma_prot_none(vma)));
}


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-13  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-06  9:14 [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 01/19] mm: compaction: Move migration fail/success stats to migrate.c Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 17:32   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 17:32     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 02/19] mm: migrate: Add a tracepoint for migrate_pages Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 17:33   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 17:33     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 03/19] mm: compaction: Add scanned and isolated counters for compaction Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 17:35   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 17:35     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 04/19] mm: numa: define _PAGE_NUMA Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 18:35   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 18:35     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 05/19] mm: numa: pte_numa() and pmd_numa() Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13  9:54   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-11-13  9:54     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 11:24     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 11:24       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 06/19] mm: numa: teach gup_fast about pmd_numa Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 10:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 10:07     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 11:37     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 11:37       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 13:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 13:51         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 07/19] mm: numa: split_huge_page: transfer the NUMA type from the pmd to the pte Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 08/19] mm: numa: Create basic numa page hinting infrastructure Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 18:58   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 18:58     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 10:38     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 10:38       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 10:48       ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 10:48         ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 11:00         ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 11:00           ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 10:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 10:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 11:50     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 11:50       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 13:49       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 13:49         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 14:26         ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 14:26           ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 09/19] mm: mempolicy: Make MPOL_LOCAL a real policy Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 10/19] mm: mempolicy: Add MPOL_MF_NOOP Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 11/19] mm: mempolicy: Check for misplaced page Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 12/19] mm: migrate: Introduce migrate_misplaced_page() Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 19:10   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 19:10     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-13  9:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13  9:36     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 11:43     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 11:56       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 11:56         ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 14:49       ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-13 14:49         ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 13/19] mm: mempolicy: Use _PAGE_NUMA to migrate pages Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 19:18   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 19:18     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 12:32     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 12:32       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 14/19] mm: mempolicy: Add MPOL_MF_LAZY Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 19:19   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 19:19     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-13 10:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 10:25     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 12:02     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 12:02       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 15/19] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 19:41   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 19:41     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 10:49     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 10:49       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 11:46       ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 11:46         ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-13 10:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 10:45     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 12:09     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 12:09       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-13 13:39       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-13 13:39         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 16/19] mm: numa: Add pte updates, hinting and migration stats Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 19:55   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 19:55     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 10:57     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 10:57       ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 11:47       ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 11:47         ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 17/19] mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 11:56   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07 11:56     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 18/19] mm: sched: numa: Implement constant, per task Working Set Sampling (WSS) rate Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 19:55   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 19:55     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06  9:14 ` [PATCH 19/19] mm: sched: numa: Implement slow start for working set sampling Mel Gorman
2012-11-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-06 19:56   ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-06 19:56     ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-07  9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing Zhouping Liu
2012-11-07 15:25   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-07 15:25     ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-08  6:37     ` Zhouping Liu
2012-11-08  6:37       ` Zhouping Liu
2012-11-08  6:39       ` 杨竹
2012-11-08  7:03         ` Zhouping Liu
2012-11-08  7:03           ` Zhouping Liu
2012-11-09 14:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-11-09 14:42   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-11-09 16:12   ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-09 16:12     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121113095417.GB21522@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.