From: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
To: chuansheng.liu@intel.com, w.sang@pengutronix.de
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:19:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115084858.GA29668@bnru10> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYekQF5111NSNSPeaHdxgS_gpXkCjqT1n-n1_iAdDXbSg@mail.gmail.com>
[...]
> From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
> To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com
>
>
>
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
>
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c | 14 --------------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
> timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
>
> - if (timeout < 0) {
> - dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> - "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> - "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> - status = timeout;
> - }
> -
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use
if (timeout == 0) {
...and the rest of the code as is
}
regards/srinidhi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com (Srinidhi Kasagar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:19:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115084858.GA29668@bnru10> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYekQF5111NSNSPeaHdxgS_gpXkCjqT1n-n1_iAdDXbSg@mail.gmail.com>
[...]
> From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
> To: linus.walleij at linaro.org, w.sang at pengutronix.de
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org,
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu at intel.com
>
>
>
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
>
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c | 14 --------------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
> timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
>
> - if (timeout < 0) {
> - dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> - "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> - "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> - status = timeout;
> - }
> -
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use
if (timeout == 0) {
...and the rest of the code as is
}
regards/srinidhi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
To: <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>, <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:19:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115084858.GA29668@bnru10> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYekQF5111NSNSPeaHdxgS_gpXkCjqT1n-n1_iAdDXbSg@mail.gmail.com>
[...]
> From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
> To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com
>
>
>
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
>
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c | 14 --------------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
> timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
>
> - if (timeout < 0) {
> - dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> - "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> - "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> - status = timeout;
> - }
> -
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use
if (timeout == 0) {
...and the rest of the code as is
}
regards/srinidhi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 17:18 [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-06 17:18 ` Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-06 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-06 11:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-06 17:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] OMAPDSS: APPLY: " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-06 11:31 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-06 17:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] wlcore: " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-06 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] can: janz-ican3: " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-06 11:43 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-11-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] mx3fb: " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] IB/srpt: " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-16 18:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] wlcore: " Luciano Coelho
2012-11-12 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: " Wolfram Sang
2012-11-12 17:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-13 1:21 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2012-11-13 1:21 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2012-11-13 7:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-13 7:58 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20121113075813.GA23119-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-13 8:00 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2012-11-13 8:00 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2012-11-13 8:00 ` Liu, Chuansheng
[not found] ` <CACRpkdYekQF5111NSNSPeaHdxgS_gpXkCjqT1n-n1_iAdDXbSg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-15 8:49 ` Srinidhi Kasagar [this message]
2012-11-15 8:49 ` Fwd: " Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 8:49 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 9:29 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-15 9:29 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-15 9:29 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20121115092953.GA418-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-15 9:57 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 9:57 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 9:57 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 10:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-15 10:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-15 10:18 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20121115101820.GC418-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-15 11:18 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 11:18 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 11:18 ` Srinidhi Kasagar
2012-11-15 10:52 ` Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-15 10:52 ` Chuansheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121115084858.GA29668@bnru10 \
--to=srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.