From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: _register() should always do register_for_each_vma(true)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121123202817.GA18907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121123202741.GA18858@redhat.com>
To support the filtering uprobe_register() should do
register_for_each_vma(true) every time the new consumer comes,
we need to install the previously nacked breakpoints.
Note:
- uprobes_mutex[] should die, what is actually protects is
alloc_uprobe().
- UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER should die too, obviously it can't work
unless uprobe has a single consumer. The consumer should
serialize with _register/_unregister itself. Or this flag
should live in uprobe_consumer->state.
- Perhaps we can do some optimizations later. For example, if
filter_chain() never returns false uprobe can record this
fact and avoid the unnecessary register_for_each_vma().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 7c98671..c80507d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -482,16 +482,12 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
up_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
}
-/* Returns the previous consumer */
-static struct uprobe_consumer *
-consumer_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
+static void consumer_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
down_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
uc->next = uprobe->consumers;
uprobe->consumers = uc;
up_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
-
- return uc->next;
}
/*
@@ -820,9 +816,15 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
return err;
}
-static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe)
+static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
- return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
+ int err;
+
+ consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
+ err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
+ if (!err) /* TODO: pointless unless the first consumer */
+ set_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
+ return err;
}
static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
@@ -867,21 +869,14 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
return -EINVAL;
- ret = 0;
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
mutex_lock(uprobes_hash(inode));
uprobe = alloc_uprobe(inode, offset);
-
- if (!uprobe) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- } else if (!consumer_add(uprobe, uc)) {
- ret = __uprobe_register(uprobe);
- if (ret) {
+ if (uprobe) {
+ ret = __uprobe_register(uprobe, uc);
+ if (ret)
__uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
- } else {
- set_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
- }
}
-
mutex_unlock(uprobes_hash(inode));
if (uprobe)
put_uprobe(uprobe);
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-23 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-23 20:27 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister preparations for filtering Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes: Move __set_bit(UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP) into alloc_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 5:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: Kill the "uprobe != NULL" check in uprobe_unregister() Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 6:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Kill the pointless inode/uc checks in register/unregister Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 6:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-13 10:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-13 13:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-13 14:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-13 14:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Kill uprobe_consumer->filter() Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 12:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: Introduce filter_chain() Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-24 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 12:04 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: _unregister() should always do register_for_each_vma(false) Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-23 20:28 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-12-13 10:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: _register() should always do register_for_each_vma(true) Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121123202817.GA18907@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.