All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Patrick McLean <patrick@cim.mcgill.ca>
Cc: Patrick McLean <patrickm@gaikai.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression with initramfs and nfsroot (appears to be in the dcache)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 02:00:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121130020047.GA4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B811BA.6070503@cim.mcgill.ca>

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:54:02PM -0800, Patrick McLean wrote:
> > 	Very interesting.  Do you have anything mounted on the corresponding
> > directories on server?  The picture looks like you are getting empty
> > fhandles in readdir+ respons for exactly the same directories that happen
> > to be mountpoints on client.  In any case, we shouldn't do that blind
> > d_drop() - empty fhandles can happen.  The only remaining question is
> > why do they happen on that set of entries.  From my reading of
> > encode_entryplus_baggage() it looks like we have compose_entry_fh()
> > failing for those entries and those entries alone.  One possible cause
> > would be d_mountpoint(dchild) being true on server.  If it is true, we
> > can declare the case closed; if not, I really wonder what's going on.
> 
> Those directories do have the server's own copies of the said directories bind mounted at the moment in a separate mount namespace.
> 
> Unmounting those directories on the server does appear to stop the WARN_ON from triggering.

OK, that settles it.  WARN_ON() and printks in the area can be dropped;
the right fix is below.  However, there's a similar place in cifs that
also needs to be dealt with and I really, really wonder why the hell do
we do d_drop() in nfs_revalidate_lookup().  It's not relevant in this
bug, but I would like to understand what's wrong with simply returning
0 from ->d_revalidate() and letting the caller (in fs/namei.c) take care
of unhashing, etc. itself.  Would make have_submounts() in there pointless
as well - we could just return 0 and let d_invalidate() take care of the
checks...  Trond?

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -450,7 +450,8 @@ void nfs_prime_dcache(struct dentry *parent, struct nfs_entry *entry)
 			nfs_refresh_inode(dentry->d_inode, entry->fattr);
 			goto out;
 		} else {
-			d_drop(dentry);
+			if (d_invalidate(dentry) != 0)
+				goto out;
 			dput(dentry);
 		}
 	}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
To: Patrick McLean <patrick-NrXZpuFoTVF8GC8d84axZg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Patrick McLean <patrickm-aTCcZBytkHbQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Trond Myklebust
	<Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Regression with initramfs and nfsroot (appears to be in the dcache)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 02:00:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121130020047.GA4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B811BA.6070503-NrXZpuFoTVF8GC8d84axZg@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:54:02PM -0800, Patrick McLean wrote:
> > 	Very interesting.  Do you have anything mounted on the corresponding
> > directories on server?  The picture looks like you are getting empty
> > fhandles in readdir+ respons for exactly the same directories that happen
> > to be mountpoints on client.  In any case, we shouldn't do that blind
> > d_drop() - empty fhandles can happen.  The only remaining question is
> > why do they happen on that set of entries.  From my reading of
> > encode_entryplus_baggage() it looks like we have compose_entry_fh()
> > failing for those entries and those entries alone.  One possible cause
> > would be d_mountpoint(dchild) being true on server.  If it is true, we
> > can declare the case closed; if not, I really wonder what's going on.
> 
> Those directories do have the server's own copies of the said directories bind mounted at the moment in a separate mount namespace.
> 
> Unmounting those directories on the server does appear to stop the WARN_ON from triggering.

OK, that settles it.  WARN_ON() and printks in the area can be dropped;
the right fix is below.  However, there's a similar place in cifs that
also needs to be dealt with and I really, really wonder why the hell do
we do d_drop() in nfs_revalidate_lookup().  It's not relevant in this
bug, but I would like to understand what's wrong with simply returning
0 from ->d_revalidate() and letting the caller (in fs/namei.c) take care
of unhashing, etc. itself.  Would make have_submounts() in there pointless
as well - we could just return 0 and let d_invalidate() take care of the
checks...  Trond?

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -450,7 +450,8 @@ void nfs_prime_dcache(struct dentry *parent, struct nfs_entry *entry)
 			nfs_refresh_inode(dentry->d_inode, entry->fattr);
 			goto out;
 		} else {
-			d_drop(dentry);
+			if (d_invalidate(dentry) != 0)
+				goto out;
 			dput(dentry);
 		}
 	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-30  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-29 19:16 Regression with initramfs and nfsroot (appears to be in the dcache) Patrick McLean
2012-11-29 21:33 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 22:06   ` Patrick McLean
2012-11-29 22:21     ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 22:53       ` Patrick McLean
2012-11-29 23:43         ` Al Viro
2012-11-30  0:19           ` Patrick McLean
2012-11-30  0:35             ` Al Viro
2012-11-30  0:57               ` Patrick McLean
2012-11-30  1:36                 ` Al Viro
2012-11-30  1:54                   ` Patrick McLean
2012-11-30  2:00                     ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-11-30  2:00                       ` Al Viro
2012-11-30  2:33                       ` Patrick McLean
2012-11-30  2:33                         ` Patrick McLean
2012-11-30  4:11                         ` Al Viro
2012-11-30  4:11                           ` Al Viro
2012-11-30 13:58                       ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-30 13:58                         ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-30 13:58                         ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-12-01 21:40                         ` Al Viro
2012-12-01  2:18                       ` Simon Kirby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121130020047.GA4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patrick@cim.mcgill.ca \
    --cc=patrickm@gaikai.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.