* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
@ 2012-12-04 21:10 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-12-04 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grant.likely
Cc: andreas, w.sang, sam, sparclinux, devicetree-discuss,
spi-devel-general, linux-i2c, software
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>> for sparc.
>>
>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>
> They should go through the subsystem trees.
I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
2012-12-04 21:10 ` David Miller
@ 2012-12-04 21:28 ` Wolfram Sang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2012-12-04 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: grant.likely, andreas, sam, sparclinux, devicetree-discuss,
spi-devel-general, linux-i2c, software
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1102 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:10:01PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
>
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
> >> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
> >> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
> >> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
> >> for sparc.
> >>
> >> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
> >> corresponding subsystem trees.
> >
> > They should go through the subsystem trees.
>
> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
Checking git history, looks like Grant added the OF-I2C helpers in
2010-06 and some SPARC OF rework was done in 2010-10. Makes sense.
So, if those are going via SPARC tree:
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
@ 2012-12-04 21:28 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2012-12-04 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: grant.likely, andreas, sam, sparclinux, devicetree-discuss,
spi-devel-general, linux-i2c, software
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1102 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:10:01PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
>
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
> >> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
> >> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
> >> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
> >> for sparc.
> >>
> >> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
> >> corresponding subsystem trees.
> >
> > They should go through the subsystem trees.
>
> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
Checking git history, looks like Grant added the OF-I2C helpers in
2010-06 and some SPARC OF rework was done in 2010-10. Makes sense.
So, if those are going via SPARC tree:
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
2012-12-04 21:10 ` David Miller
@ 2012-12-04 21:49 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-12-04 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: Andreas Larsson, Wolfram Sang, Sam Ravnborg, sparclinux,
devicetree-discuss, spi-devel-general, Linux I2C, software
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>>> for sparc.
>>>
>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>>
>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
>
> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
knickers in a knot if you insist.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
@ 2012-12-04 21:49 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-12-04 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: Andreas Larsson, Wolfram Sang, Sam Ravnborg, sparclinux,
devicetree-discuss, spi-devel-general, Linux I2C, software
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>>> for sparc.
>>>
>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>>
>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
>
> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
knickers in a knot if you insist.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CACxGe6t4YcSuh04UjoYqFp355iLa6ECc5G+Y1TP3kxsL48c6jQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
[not found] ` <CACxGe6t4YcSuh04UjoYqFp355iLa6ECc5G+Y1TP3kxsL48c6jQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-12-07 17:30 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-12-07 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ
Cc: andreas-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ, w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ,
sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw, sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, software-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:26 +0000
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>>>> for sparc.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>>>
>>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
>>
>> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
>
> I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
> knickers in a knot if you insist.
That's fine:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
@ 2012-12-07 17:30 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-12-07 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ
Cc: andreas-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ, w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ,
sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw, sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, software-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:26 +0000
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
>>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>>>> for sparc.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>>>
>>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
>>
>> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
>
> I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
> knickers in a knot if you insist.
That's fine:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20121207.123057.2230821059287428618.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
[not found] ` <20121207.123057.2230821059287428618.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-12-10 22:32 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-12-10 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: andreas-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ, w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ,
sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw, sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, software-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ
On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:30:57 -0500 (EST), David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:26 +0000
>
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
> >>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
> >>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
> >>>> for sparc.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
> >>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
> >>>
> >>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
> >>
> >> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
> >
> > I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
> > knickers in a knot if you insist.
>
> That's fine:
>
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Applied, thanks.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc: Enable OF functionality for sparc for i2c and spi
@ 2012-12-10 22:32 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-12-10 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: andreas-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ, w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ,
sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw, sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, software-FkzTOoA/JUlBDgjK7y7TUQ
On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:30:57 -0500 (EST), David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:26 +0000
>
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> >> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> >> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
> >>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
> >>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
> >>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
> >>>> for sparc.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
> >>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
> >>>
> >>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
> >>
> >> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
> >
> > I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
> > knickers in a knot if you insist.
>
> That's fine:
>
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Applied, thanks.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread