All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, J??rn Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Downgrade mmap_sem before locking or populating on mmap
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:41:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121216084146.GA21690@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUS7baKF7cdbrqX-o2qdeo1Uk=7Z4MHcxHMA3Luh+Obdw@mail.gmail.com>


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:14:50AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >> > Wait a minute.  get_user_pages() relies on ->mmap_sem being held.  Unless
> >> > I'm seriously misreading your patch it removes that protection.  And yes,
> >> > I'm aware of execve-related exception; it's in special circumstances -
> >> > bprm->mm is guaranteed to be not shared (and we need to rearchitect that
> >> > area anyway, but that's a separate story).
> >>
> >> Unless I completely screwed up the patch, ->mmap_sem is still held for
> >> read (it's downgraded from write).  It's just not held for write
> >> anymore.
> >
> > Huh?  I'm talking about the call of get_user_pages() in aio_setup_ring().
> > With your patch it's done completely outside of ->mmap_sem, isn't it?
> 
> Oh, /that/ call to get_user_pages.  That would qualify as screwing up...
> 
> Since dropping and reacquiring mmap_sem there is probably a 
> bad idea there, I'll rework this and post a v2.

It probably does not matter much, as aio_setup() is an utter 
slowpath, but I suspect you could still use the downgrading 
variant of do_mmap_pgoff_unlock() here too:

	int downgraded = 0;

	...

        down_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
        /*
         * XXX: If MCL_FUTURE is set, this will hold mmap_sem for write for
         *      longer than necessary.
         */
        info->mmap_base = do_mmap_pgoff_helper(NULL, 0, info->mmap_size,
                                        PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
                                        MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, 0, &downgraded);
        if (IS_ERR((void *)info->mmap_base)) {
		up_read_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem, downgraded);
                info->mmap_size = 0;
                aio_free_ring(ctx);
                return -EAGAIN;
        }

        dprintk("mmap address: 0x%08lx\n", info->mmap_base);
        info->nr_pages = get_user_pages(current, ctx->mm,
                                        info->mmap_base, nr_pages,
                                        1, 0, info->ring_pages, NULL);
	up_read_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem, downgraded);

Where up_read_write(lock, read) is a new primitive/wrapper that 
does the up_read()/up_write() depending on the value of 
'downgraded'.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, J??rn Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Downgrade mmap_sem before locking or populating on mmap
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:41:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121216084146.GA21690@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUS7baKF7cdbrqX-o2qdeo1Uk=7Z4MHcxHMA3Luh+Obdw@mail.gmail.com>


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:14:50AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >> > Wait a minute.  get_user_pages() relies on ->mmap_sem being held.  Unless
> >> > I'm seriously misreading your patch it removes that protection.  And yes,
> >> > I'm aware of execve-related exception; it's in special circumstances -
> >> > bprm->mm is guaranteed to be not shared (and we need to rearchitect that
> >> > area anyway, but that's a separate story).
> >>
> >> Unless I completely screwed up the patch, ->mmap_sem is still held for
> >> read (it's downgraded from write).  It's just not held for write
> >> anymore.
> >
> > Huh?  I'm talking about the call of get_user_pages() in aio_setup_ring().
> > With your patch it's done completely outside of ->mmap_sem, isn't it?
> 
> Oh, /that/ call to get_user_pages.  That would qualify as screwing up...
> 
> Since dropping and reacquiring mmap_sem there is probably a 
> bad idea there, I'll rework this and post a v2.

It probably does not matter much, as aio_setup() is an utter 
slowpath, but I suspect you could still use the downgrading 
variant of do_mmap_pgoff_unlock() here too:

	int downgraded = 0;

	...

        down_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
        /*
         * XXX: If MCL_FUTURE is set, this will hold mmap_sem for write for
         *      longer than necessary.
         */
        info->mmap_base = do_mmap_pgoff_helper(NULL, 0, info->mmap_size,
                                        PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
                                        MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, 0, &downgraded);
        if (IS_ERR((void *)info->mmap_base)) {
		up_read_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem, downgraded);
                info->mmap_size = 0;
                aio_free_ring(ctx);
                return -EAGAIN;
        }

        dprintk("mmap address: 0x%08lx\n", info->mmap_base);
        info->nr_pages = get_user_pages(current, ctx->mm,
                                        info->mmap_base, nr_pages,
                                        1, 0, info->ring_pages, NULL);
	up_read_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem, downgraded);

Where up_read_write(lock, read) is a new primitive/wrapper that 
does the up_read()/up_write() depending on the value of 
'downgraded'.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-16  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-14  5:49 [PATCH] mm: Downgrade mmap_sem before locking or populating on mmap Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14  5:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14  7:27 ` Al Viro
2012-12-14  7:27   ` Al Viro
2012-12-14 11:14   ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14 11:14     ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14 14:49     ` Al Viro
2012-12-14 14:49       ` Al Viro
2012-12-14 16:12       ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14 16:12         ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16  8:41         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-12-16  8:41           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-16 17:04         ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 17:04           ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 17:48           ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 17:48             ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 18:49           ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-16 18:49             ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-16 19:53           ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 19:53             ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 20:16           ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 20:16             ` Al Viro
2012-12-15  2:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-15  2:17   ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16  9:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-16  9:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-16 17:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16 17:52       ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-17  9:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-17  9:52         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-18  0:54         ` [PATCH v3] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-18  0:54           ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-20  2:22           ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-20  2:22             ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-16 12:39   ` [PATCH v2] " Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-16 12:39     ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-16 18:05     ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16 18:05       ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-17  3:29       ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-17  3:29         ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-17 22:01         ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-17 22:01           ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16 19:58   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-16 19:58     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121216084146.GA21690@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.