From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945 IP phones
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:44:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121217004457.GA12234@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355703441.18919.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Hi David,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:17:21AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 08:52 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le dimanche 21 novembre 2010 à 18:40 -0800, Kevin Cernekee a écrit :
> > > [v3:
> > > Only activate the new forced_dport logic if the IP matches, but the
> > > port does not. ]
> > >
> > > Most SIP devices use a source port of 5060/udp on SIP requests, so the
> > > response automatically comes back to port 5060:
> > >
> > > phone_ip:5060 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
> > >
> > > The newer Cisco IP phones, however, use a randomly chosen high source
> > > port for the SIP request but expect the response on port 5060:
> > >
> > > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
> > >
> > > Standard Linux NAT, with or without nf_nat_sip, will send the reply back
> > > to port 49173, not 5060:
> > >
> > > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:49173 100 Trying
> > >
> > > But the phone is not listening on 49173, so it will never see the reply.
> > >
> > > This patch modifies nf_*_sip to work around this quirk by extracting
> > > the SIP response port from the Via: header, iff the source IP in the
> > > packet header matches the source IP in the SIP request.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Thanks for doing this work Keven !
> >
> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>
> What happened to this? OpenWRT is still carrying it, and it broke in
> 3.7. Here's a completely untested update...
I requested Kevin to resend a new version based on the current kernel
tree while spinning on old pending patches since I have no access to
that hardware, but no luck.
So I'll review this and, since OpenWRT is carrying, I guess we can get
this into net-next merge window.
Thanks for the reminder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945 IP phones
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:44:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121217004457.GA12234@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355703441.18919.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Hi David,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:17:21AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 08:52 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le dimanche 21 novembre 2010 à 18:40 -0800, Kevin Cernekee a écrit :
> > > [v3:
> > > Only activate the new forced_dport logic if the IP matches, but the
> > > port does not. ]
> > >
> > > Most SIP devices use a source port of 5060/udp on SIP requests, so the
> > > response automatically comes back to port 5060:
> > >
> > > phone_ip:5060 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
> > >
> > > The newer Cisco IP phones, however, use a randomly chosen high source
> > > port for the SIP request but expect the response on port 5060:
> > >
> > > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
> > >
> > > Standard Linux NAT, with or without nf_nat_sip, will send the reply back
> > > to port 49173, not 5060:
> > >
> > > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:49173 100 Trying
> > >
> > > But the phone is not listening on 49173, so it will never see the reply.
> > >
> > > This patch modifies nf_*_sip to work around this quirk by extracting
> > > the SIP response port from the Via: header, iff the source IP in the
> > > packet header matches the source IP in the SIP request.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Thanks for doing this work Keven !
> >
> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>
> What happened to this? OpenWRT is still carrying it, and it broke in
> 3.7. Here's a completely untested update...
I requested Kevin to resend a new version based on the current kernel
tree while spinning on old pending patches since I have no access to
that hardware, but no luck.
So I'll review this and, since OpenWRT is carrying, I guess we can get
this into net-next merge window.
Thanks for the reminder.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-17 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 2:40 [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945 IP phones Kevin Cernekee
2010-11-22 2:40 ` Kevin Cernekee
2010-11-22 2:40 ` Kevin Cernekee
2010-11-22 7:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-12-17 0:17 ` David Woodhouse
2012-12-17 0:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-12-17 0:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-17 7:26 ` Kevin Cernekee
2012-12-17 9:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121217004457.GA12234@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.