From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:35:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220173548.GB4989@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMiZTF4gogCkU7eSaOydkX82wfWywkKBgCJo_-ZW0Ox4kw@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [121220 09:30]:
> [proper reply-to-all this time]
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> One of the sunxi patches from the last pull request was misapplied (I
> >> realized what happened -- git am -s didn't apply cleanly so I had done it
> >> through regular patch, thus not catching the renames properly). Here's
> >> a fresh version of the pull request with a couple more OMAP and Samsung
> >> patches included.
> >
> > Argh!
> >
> > I pulled your earlier branch due to Tony's ack, and now you're
> > re-created that branch with new pulls (effectively rebasing it).
> >
> > Don't do things like this to me.
>
> Yeah, sorry about that -- I wanted to replace the broken patch, and
> Tony's branch was based on a newer version of your tree so I brought
> everything forward as I had to rebase anyway.
>
> I'll rebuild on top of what you've pulled, and send a fresh request of
> just the delta. Sorry about the race condition here.
Sorry for me adding to the confusion too.
Looks like Linus already applied "ARM: OMAP: Fix build breakage due
to missing include in i2c.c" that I had queued earlier.
Olof, I suggest you just merge my pull request up to the other commit
c16acf12 (ARM: OMAP2+: Fix compillation error in mach-omap2/timer.c).
Or just pick it whichever works better for you.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:35:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220173548.GB4989@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMiZTF4gogCkU7eSaOydkX82wfWywkKBgCJo_-ZW0Ox4kw@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [121220 09:30]:
> [proper reply-to-all this time]
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> One of the sunxi patches from the last pull request was misapplied (I
> >> realized what happened -- git am -s didn't apply cleanly so I had done it
> >> through regular patch, thus not catching the renames properly). Here's
> >> a fresh version of the pull request with a couple more OMAP and Samsung
> >> patches included.
> >
> > Argh!
> >
> > I pulled your earlier branch due to Tony's ack, and now you're
> > re-created that branch with new pulls (effectively rebasing it).
> >
> > Don't do things like this to me.
>
> Yeah, sorry about that -- I wanted to replace the broken patch, and
> Tony's branch was based on a newer version of your tree so I brought
> everything forward as I had to rebase anyway.
>
> I'll rebuild on top of what you've pulled, and send a fresh request of
> just the delta. Sorry about the race condition here.
Sorry for me adding to the confusion too.
Looks like Linus already applied "ARM: OMAP: Fix build breakage due
to missing include in i2c.c" that I had queued earlier.
Olof, I suggest you just merge my pull request up to the other commit
c16acf12 (ARM: OMAP2+: Fix compillation error in mach-omap2/timer.c).
Or just pick it whichever works better for you.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-20 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-20 16:38 [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8 Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 16:38 ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 17:28 ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 17:28 ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 17:35 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-12-20 17:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 17:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-20 17:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-20 18:08 ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 18:08 ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 18:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 18:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:50 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Trivial fix for IOMMU merge issue (Re: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8) Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-21 2:43 ` [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-12-21 2:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-12-20 18:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-20 18:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121220173548.GB4989@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.