All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:08:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220190847.GF21056@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyiRPk0Qta35PBqMFqn+GkKaugqKJM3WHCT0JEJ1YohWw@mail.gmail.com>

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [121220 11:03]:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing the "BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0" issue
> > reported and fixed here:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135594868503683&w=2
> >
> > But that's probably been already posted as a proper patch
> > somewhere?
> 
> Hmm. The patch there looks better than any alternative I can think of.
> It uses the same spinlock name for the whole array, but I think it's
> only used for lockdep printouts, so that should be fine.
> 
> Send me the patch with signed-off and tested-by, and perhaps have a
> few more people test it. The powerpc and sparc people both use it in
> their 32-bit versions and have responsible maintainers, so it might be
> worth it double-checking with BenH and DaveM about it, just in case.
> Added to the Cc.

Looks like it's been posted to LKML as:

[PATCH] lib: atomic64: Initialize locks statically to fix early users

Replied to it with my tested-by if you want to pick it up.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:08:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220190847.GF21056@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyiRPk0Qta35PBqMFqn+GkKaugqKJM3WHCT0JEJ1YohWw@mail.gmail.com>

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [121220 11:03]:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing the "BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0" issue
> > reported and fixed here:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135594868503683&w=2
> >
> > But that's probably been already posted as a proper patch
> > somewhere?
> 
> Hmm. The patch there looks better than any alternative I can think of.
> It uses the same spinlock name for the whole array, but I think it's
> only used for lockdep printouts, so that should be fine.
> 
> Send me the patch with signed-off and tested-by, and perhaps have a
> few more people test it. The powerpc and sparc people both use it in
> their 32-bit versions and have responsible maintainers, so it might be
> worth it double-checking with BenH and DaveM about it, just in case.
> Added to the Cc.

Looks like it's been posted to LKML as:

[PATCH] lib: atomic64: Initialize locks statically to fix early users

Replied to it with my tested-by if you want to pick it up.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-20 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-20 16:38 [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8 Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 16:38 ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 16:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 17:28   ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 17:28     ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 17:35     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 17:35       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 17:44       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 17:44         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 17:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-20 17:56   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-20 18:08   ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 18:08     ` Olof Johansson
2012-12-20 18:45     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 18:45       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:00       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 19:00         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-20 19:08         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-12-20 19:08           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:50           ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Trivial fix for IOMMU merge issue (Re: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8) Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:50             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-21  2:43         ` [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-12-21  2:43           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-12-20 18:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-20 18:47       ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121220190847.GF21056@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.