From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix null pointer dereference in wait_iff_congested()
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:50:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121231005013.GA3641@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50DD9EA7.6050309@iskon.hr>
Hi Zlatko,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 02:29:11PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> On 28.12.2012 03:49, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Hello Zlatko,
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:16:38AM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >>From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
> >>
> >>The unintended consequence of commit 4ae0a48b is that
> >>wait_iff_congested() can now be called with NULL struct zone*
> >>producing kernel oops like this:
> >
> >For good description, it would be better to write simple pseudo code
> >flow to show how NULL-zone pass into wait_iff_congested because
> >kswapd code flow is too complex.
> >
> >As I see the code, we have following line above wait_iff_congested.
> >
> >if (!unbalanced_zone || blah blah)
> > break;
> >
> >How can NULL unbalanced_zone reach wait_iff_congested?
> >
>
> Hello Minchan, and thanks for the comment.
>
> That line was there before commit 4ae0a48b got in, and you're right,
Argh, I didn't see 4ae0a48b in 3.8-rc1.
> it's what was protecting wait_iff_congested() from being called with
> NULL zone*. But then all that logic got colapsed to a simple
> pgdat_balanced() call and that's when I introduced the bug, I lost
> the protection.
>
> What I _think_ is happening (pseudo code following...) is that after
> scanning the zone in the dma->highmem direction, and concluding that
> all zones are balanced (unbalanced_zone remains NULL!),
> wake_up(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait) wakes up a lot of memory hungry
> processes (especially true in various aggressive test/benchmarks)
> that immediately drain and unbalance one or more zones. Then
> pgdat_balanced() call which immediately follows will be false, but
> we still have unbalanced_zone = NULL, rememeber? Oops...
>
> But, all that is a speculation that I can't prove atm. Of course, if
> anybody thinks that's a credible explanation, I could add it as a
> commit comment, or even as a code comment, but I didn't want to be
> overly imaginative. The fix itself is simple and real.
Never mind. My confusing is caused my missing 4ae0a48b in lasest tree.
Thanks, Zlatko.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Zlatko
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix null pointer dereference in wait_iff_congested()
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:50:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121231005013.GA3641@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50DD9EA7.6050309@iskon.hr>
Hi Zlatko,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 02:29:11PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> On 28.12.2012 03:49, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Hello Zlatko,
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:16:38AM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >>From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
> >>
> >>The unintended consequence of commit 4ae0a48b is that
> >>wait_iff_congested() can now be called with NULL struct zone*
> >>producing kernel oops like this:
> >
> >For good description, it would be better to write simple pseudo code
> >flow to show how NULL-zone pass into wait_iff_congested because
> >kswapd code flow is too complex.
> >
> >As I see the code, we have following line above wait_iff_congested.
> >
> >if (!unbalanced_zone || blah blah)
> > break;
> >
> >How can NULL unbalanced_zone reach wait_iff_congested?
> >
>
> Hello Minchan, and thanks for the comment.
>
> That line was there before commit 4ae0a48b got in, and you're right,
Argh, I didn't see 4ae0a48b in 3.8-rc1.
> it's what was protecting wait_iff_congested() from being called with
> NULL zone*. But then all that logic got colapsed to a simple
> pgdat_balanced() call and that's when I introduced the bug, I lost
> the protection.
>
> What I _think_ is happening (pseudo code following...) is that after
> scanning the zone in the dma->highmem direction, and concluding that
> all zones are balanced (unbalanced_zone remains NULL!),
> wake_up(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait) wakes up a lot of memory hungry
> processes (especially true in various aggressive test/benchmarks)
> that immediately drain and unbalance one or more zones. Then
> pgdat_balanced() call which immediately follows will be false, but
> we still have unbalanced_zone = NULL, rememeber? Oops...
>
> But, all that is a speculation that I can't prove atm. Of course, if
> anybody thinks that's a credible explanation, I could add it as a
> commit comment, or even as a code comment, but I didn't want to be
> overly imaginative. The fix itself is simple and real.
Never mind. My confusing is caused my missing 4ae0a48b in lasest tree.
Thanks, Zlatko.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Zlatko
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-31 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 23:17 [PATCH] mm: do not sleep in balance_pgdat if there's no i/o congestion Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-19 23:17 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-19 23:25 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-19 23:25 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-21 11:51 ` Hillf Danton
2012-12-21 11:51 ` Hillf Danton
2012-12-27 15:42 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-27 15:42 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-29 7:25 ` Hillf Danton
2012-12-29 7:25 ` Hillf Danton
2012-12-29 12:11 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-29 12:11 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-20 11:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-20 11:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-20 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-20 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-22 18:54 ` [PATCH] mm: modify pgdat_balanced() so that it also handles order=0 Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-22 18:54 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-23 14:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-23 14:12 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-26 15:07 ` [PATCH] mm: avoid calling pgdat_balanced() needlessly Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-26 15:07 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-28 2:16 ` [PATCH] mm: fix null pointer dereference in wait_iff_congested() Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-28 2:16 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-28 2:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-12-28 2:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-12-28 13:29 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-28 13:29 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-31 0:50 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-12-31 0:50 ` Minchan Kim
2012-12-29 8:45 ` Sedat Dilek
2012-12-29 8:45 ` Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121231005013.GA3641@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr \
--cc=zliu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.