Re: [PATCH] mm: do not sleep in balance_pgdat if there's no i/o congestion

[Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>]

On 29.12.2012 08:25, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Zlatko Calusic
> <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr> wrote:
>> On 21.12.2012 12:51, Hillf Danton wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>>>>                                                           int
>>>> *classzone_idx)
>>>>    {
>>>> -       int all_zones_ok;
>>>> +       struct zone *unbalanced_zone;
>>>
>>>
>>> nit: less hunks if not erase that mark
>>>
>>> Hillf
>>
>>
>> This one left unanswered and forgotten because I didn't understand what you
>> meant. Could you elaborate?
>>
> Sure, the patch looks simpler(and nicer) if we dont
> erase all_zones_ok.
>

Ah, yes. I gave it a good thought. But, when I introduced 
unbalanced_zone it just didn't make much sense to me to have two 
variables with very similar meaning. If I decided to keep all_zones_ok, 
it would be either:

all_zones_ok = true
unbalanced_zone = NULL
(meaning: if no zone in unbalanced, then all zones must be ok)

or

all_zones_ok = false
unbalanced_zone = struct zone *
(meaning: if there's an unbalanced zone, then certainly not all zones 
are ok)

So I decided to use only unbalanced_zone (because I had to!), and remove 
all_zones_ok to avoid redundancy. I hope it makes sense.

If you check my latest (and still queued) optimization (mm: avoid 
calling pgdat_balanced() needlessly), there again popped up a need for a 
boolean, but I called it pgdat_is_balanced this time, just to match the 
name of two other functions. It could've also been called all_zones_ok 
if you prefer the name? Of course, I have no strong feelings about the 
name, both are OK, so if you want me to redo the patch, just say.

Generally speaking, while I always attempt to make a smaller patch (less 
hunks and less changes = easier to review), before that I'll always try 
to make the code that results from the commit cleaner, simpler, more 
readable.

For example, I'll always check that I don't mess with whitespace 
needlessly, unless I think it's actually desirable, here's just one example:

"mm: avoid calling pgdat_balanced() needlessly" changes

---
         } while (--sc.priority >= 0);
out:

         if (!pgdat_balanced(pgdat, order, *classzone_idx)) {
---

to

---
         } while (--sc.priority >= 0);

out:
         if (!pgdat_is_balanced) {
---

because I find the latter more correct place for the label "out".

Thanks for the comment.
-- 
Zlatko

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>