From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:59:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130104175918.GA29537@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130104160148.GB3885@suse.de>
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:08:48PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Instead, I disabled THP+compaction under v3.7.1 and I've been unable to
> > reproduce the issue without THP+compaction.
> >
>
> Implying that it's stuck in compaction somewhere. It could be the case
> that compaction alters timing enough to trigger another bug. You say it
> tests differently depending on whether TCP or unix sockets are used
> which might indicate multiple problems. However, lets try and see if
> compaction is the primary problem or not.
I haven't managed to reproduce the issue on Unix sockets, yet, just TCP.
Trying Unix with 90KB as Eric Dumazet suggested.
I'll get the info you need from /proc soon.
Thank you for looking at this!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:59:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130104175918.GA29537@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130104160148.GB3885@suse.de>
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:08:48PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Instead, I disabled THP+compaction under v3.7.1 and I've been unable to
> > reproduce the issue without THP+compaction.
> >
>
> Implying that it's stuck in compaction somewhere. It could be the case
> that compaction alters timing enough to trigger another bug. You say it
> tests differently depending on whether TCP or unix sockets are used
> which might indicate multiple problems. However, lets try and see if
> compaction is the primary problem or not.
I haven't managed to reproduce the issue on Unix sockets, yet, just TCP.
Trying Unix with 90KB as Eric Dumazet suggested.
I'll get the info you need from /proc soon.
Thank you for looking at this!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-28 1:45 ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending Eric Wong
2012-12-28 7:06 ` Eric Wong
2012-12-29 11:34 ` Eric Wong
2012-12-31 13:21 ` [PATCH] poll: prevent missed events if _qproc is NULL Eric Wong
2012-12-31 23:24 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-01 16:58 ` Junchang(Jason) Wang
2013-01-01 18:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-01 21:00 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-01 21:17 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-01 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-01-01 23:21 ` Junchang(Jason) Wang
2013-01-01 23:56 ` [PATCH] epoll: prevent missed events on EPOLL_CTL_MOD Eric Wong
2013-01-02 17:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-02 18:40 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-02 19:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-02 19:32 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-02 22:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-02 21:16 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-02 20:08 ` ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending Eric Wong
2013-01-02 20:08 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-02 20:47 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-02 20:47 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-03 13:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-03 13:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-03 18:32 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-03 18:32 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-03 23:45 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-03 23:45 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-04 0:26 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-04 0:26 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-04 3:52 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-04 3:52 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-04 16:01 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-04 16:01 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-04 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-04 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-04 17:59 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2013-01-04 17:59 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-05 1:07 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-05 1:07 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-06 12:07 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-06 12:07 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-07 12:25 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-07 12:25 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-07 22:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-07 22:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-08 0:21 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-08 0:21 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-07 22:38 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-07 22:38 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-08 20:14 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-08 20:14 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-08 22:43 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-08 22:43 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-08 23:23 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-08 23:23 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 2:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-09 2:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-09 2:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-09 2:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-09 2:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-09 2:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-09 3:55 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 3:55 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 8:42 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 8:42 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 8:51 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 8:51 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 13:42 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-09 13:42 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-09 13:37 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-09 13:37 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-09 13:50 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-09 13:50 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-10 9:25 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-10 9:25 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-10 19:42 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-10 19:42 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-10 20:03 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-10 20:03 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-10 20:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 20:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-11 0:51 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-11 0:51 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-11 9:30 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-11 9:30 ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-09 21:29 ` Eric Wong
2013-01-09 21:29 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130104175918.GA29537@dcvr.yhbt.net \
--to=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.